IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsk/journ0/7961842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning and a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation for optimal decumulation: a comparison study

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Chen
  • Mohammad Shirazi
  • Peter A. Forsyth
  • Yuying Li

Abstract

Without resorting to dynamic programming, we determine the decumulation strategy for the holder of a defined contribution pension plan. We formulate this as a constrained stochastic optimal control problem. Our approach is based on data-driven neural network optimization. Customized activation functions for the output layers of the neural network are applied, which permits training via standard unconstrained optimization. The optimal solution yields a multiperiod decumulation and asset allocation strategy, useful for a holder of a defined contribution pension plan. The objective function of the optimal control problem is a weighted measure of the expected wealth withdrawn and the expected shortfall, and it directly targets left-tail risk. The stochastic bound constraints enforce a guaranteed minimum withdrawal each year. We show that in terms of numerical results the neural network approach compares favorably with a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman partial differential equation computational framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Chen & Mohammad Shirazi & Peter A. Forsyth & Yuying Li, . "Machine learning and a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation for optimal decumulation: a comparison study," Journal of Computational Finance, Journal of Computational Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:7961842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.risk.net/node/7961842
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsk:journ0:7961842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Paine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.risk.net/journal-of-computational-finance .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.