IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsg/littra/2017-020.html

Hedging in Academic Discourse: Native English Speakers vs. Czech and Slovak Writers

Author

Listed:
  • VÄ›ra Sládková

Abstract

The pervasiveness of hedging in Anglo-American academic discourse is determined by the dialogic nature of research articles, which allow scientists to tentatively present their findings and ask colleagues with modesty and deference for their acceptance. Hedging devices allow researchers to express the lack of complete commitment to the truth of the proposition, or unwillingness to state a claim categorically. The comparison of frequencies and functions of hedging devices in individual sections of native English speakers’ research articles to those written by Czech and Slovak authors revealed considerable differences in the article structure and the overall aims of individual sections, which is probably caused by the different socio-pragmatic context. Czech and Slovak writers underestimate the use of mainly reader-motivated hedges in all parts of the articles, do not appear to admit the constraints of the research, and seldom show awareness of the relatively minor value of their findings.

Suggested Citation

  • VÄ›ra Sládková, 2017. "Hedging in Academic Discourse: Native English Speakers vs. Czech and Slovak Writers," Littera Scripta, VSTE, vol. 10(2), May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rsg:littra:2017-020
    DOI: 10.36708/LS.2017.I02.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://littera-scripta.com/articles/hedging-in-academic-discourse-native-english-speakers-vs-czech-and-slovak-writer-b101f51a
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36708/LS.2017.I02.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsg:littra:2017-020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robin Kunju Mol Raj (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://littera-scripta.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.