IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsg/littra/2017-017.html

The Spatial Delimitation of Agglomerations in the Czech Republic: The Case of Northwestern Bohemia

Author

Listed:
  • Václav Novák

Abstract

This contribution has a purpose to introduce a method of spatial delimitation of the agglomerations in the Czech Republic. A model territory was chosen in the borderland territory of northwestern Bohemia, which is, on Czech terms, strongly urbanized. In this area, with five larger cities, a high potential of agglomeration with surrounding settlements is supposed. The data about intercommunal commuting to work, from the Census 2011 were representing the fundamental data complement used for delimitation of agglomerated areas. The algorithm used for defining agglomerations was based on necessity of existence of reciprocal work commuting interactions. It was approached by progressive merging of municipalities with agglomeration, limited by threshold values of preselected relativized commuting criteria. Except the city of DÄ›Ä Ã­n, the only core of agglomeration that does not lay in the coal field, there were quite extensive agglomerated areas defined. They are not only spatialy closed, but they are even neighbors. Except the Ústí agglomeration, delimited agglomerations are reporting low attractivity, in terms off commuting to work. The most significant regional concentration of inhabitants having a high grade of integration are the Ústí and Teplice agglomerations. This finding is in agreement with the regional spatial planning documentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Václav Novák, 2017. "The Spatial Delimitation of Agglomerations in the Czech Republic: The Case of Northwestern Bohemia," Littera Scripta, VSTE, vol. 10(2), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsg:littra:2017-017
    DOI: 10.36708/LS.2017.I02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://littera-scripta.com/articles/the-spatial-delimitation-of-agglomerations-in-the-czech-republic-the-case-of-nor-59dc563f
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36708/LS.2017.I02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsg:littra:2017-017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robin Kunju Mol Raj (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://littera-scripta.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.