Author
Abstract
For the state budget any tax relief means tax revenue not received. Thus, on one hand, every tax relief provides support to a definite group of tax payers; on the other hand, it makes the tax administration process more complicated and costly. Corporate income tax relief is a tool to ensure economic competitiveness, attract new investments, correct market shortcomings and achieve social goals. Often, these incentives can significantly reduce the budget revenues, in particular – in case when more and more new relief incentives are introduced. In certain circumstances, such incentives do not function as an effective instrument for achieving economic and social objectives, and the benefits acquired are not adequate to the amount of resources spent on the administration of these incentives. In geographically and numerically small countries like Latvia, the opportunities of tax element (object, subject, rates, incentives, etc.) usage as a tax instrument for the regional development are not addressed. This paper will assess the efficiency of income tax relief incentives in Latvia in the given economic conditions while taking into account their economic and social significance at the current moment and will attempt to forecast the potential impact on the business environment incentives, if tax reliefs are differentiated for different regions of the country to stimulate the disadvantaged ones. Evaluation of tax incentives has been developed in international practice and methodology. The guidelines worked out by Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (hereinafter – the OECD) and International Monetary Fund (hereinafter – the IMF) will be taken into account in this report (OECD 2010; Klemm, Van Parys 2009). Důležitost definovánà daňových pobÃdek pro daň z pÅ™Ãjmů právnických osob s cÃlem zvýšit jejich efektivnost
Suggested Citation
Biruta Pule & Gunta Innuse, 2011.
"The importance of defining corporate income tax incentive objectives in order to enhance their effectiveness,"
Littera Scripta, VSTE, vol. 4(2), May.
Handle:
RePEc:rsg:littra:2011-028
DOI: 10.36708/LS.2011.I02.004
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsg:littra:2011-028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robin Kunju Mol Raj (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://littera-scripta.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.