IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsf/jgrcss/v3y2023i1p73-88.html

The Estimation and Power of Alternative Discretionary Accruals Models

Author

Listed:
  • Adedeji Daniel Gbadebo

    (Walter Sisulu University)

  • Ahmed Oluwatobi Adekunle

    (Walter Sisulu University)

  • Joseph Olorunfemi Akande

    (Walter Sisulu University)

Abstract

Discretionary accruals remain decade's long measures to detect earnings management in empirical accounting research. The correctness of the specifications and test power of the information content for the models remains unexplored based on samples of most emerging market firms. Yet, country's-based researchers have increasingly used different Jones-based discretionary accruals to proxy earnings management. The paper aims to evaluate four discretionary accruals models and to decide the most appropriate one for the detection of earnings management. For the aim, we apply regression methods to estimate and evaluate four Jones-type discretionary accruals models - simple Jones, modified Jones, extended Jones cash flow model and working capital accruals - based on evidence of a final sample of 1,852 firm-year of 102 firms in Nigeria during 2001-2020. The results disclose that all models are well-specified such that the likelihood of Type I errors is minimum and below the significance level of 5%. In order to demonstrate the power of the test, the simulations completed identify that the modified Jones model exhibits the highest power capability. The implication of this finding is that the modified Jones model is the most appropriate model to detect earnings management based on the Nigerian sample.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:rsf:jgrcss:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:73-88
DOI: 10.31098/jgrcs.v3i1.1197
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://journals.researchsynergypress.com/index.php/jgrcs/article/download/1197/1071
File Function: Full text
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31098/jgrcs.v3i1.1197?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsf:jgrcss:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:73-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Santi Rahmawati (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.researchsynergypress.com/index.php/jgrcs .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.