Adaptive stability as the conceptual model for managing Russian corporate structures in modern geoeconomic environment
This article represents the author's approach to provision of adaptive stability of corporate structures as the essential characteristic in a highly moderated geoeconomic uncertainty environment. The analysis of current theoretical and methodological background of modern corporate management, such as network economics theory, financial globalization theory, uncertainty theory within conspiracy theories group, economic and mathematical instruments in supporting management decision making, including a group of methods of fuzzy sets theory, risk management theory and modern aspects of finance and credit theory has demonstrated a principal change in properties and manifestations of economic systems, which allows to draw the conclusion that current risk management technologies are dysfunctional in modern geoeconomic environment due to manifestation of negative network effects, hypersystematic qualities of economics and limitations of available scale of implication of modern analytical instruments. Within the typological structure for types of stability of corporate structures the following types can be distinguished: non-adaptive instability, non-adaptive stability and stable adaptivity. According to the author, adaptive stability in development of corporate structures can be provided by the presumption of achieving the hormesis type reactions as the main criterion in the system of making management decisions. The type of stability of a corporate structure is determined by a system of linguistic variables as well as financial strategy parameters, because the kind and configuration of the engaged financial instruments in finansomics environment demonstrates some serious influence on the mechanism of management decision making, which is especially important when analyzing strategic objectives and vectors of movement of global financial capital. In practice building-up financial sovereignty with consideration of financial flexibility as well as provision of technological sovereignty with involvement of instruments, providing informational interaction and consulting, is essential for the stable development of corporate structures.
Volume (Year): 8 (2014)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Bucharest, 6th district, 47 Fabricii Street, Quadra Place, bl.J, fl.1, ap.12|
Web page: http://www.reaser.eu/pgsa/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:8:y:2014:i:2:p:13-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Manuela Epure)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.