IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

A study of traditional discussion boards and socia media within an online landscape architecture course

Listed author(s):
  • George, Benjamin H.

    (Utah State University, USA)

Registered author(s):

    Distributed design education is increasingly important in the education of designers. However, there is persistent concern about the ability of distributed design education to facilitate the rich communication necessary for the critiquing and collaboration that normally occurs within a design studio. This paper compares the use of a social networking site to a traditional discussion board in facilitating communication within an introduction to landscape architecture course. The study found that students engaged in more meaningful discussion when using the social networking site, but that the social networking site did not produce any measurable improvement in the quantity or depth of interactions between students. The results suggest that social networking sites alter the type of communication students engage in, but should utilize students’ existing social networks to be most effective as there is insufficient time within an individual course for students to build a new social network around their course peers. The study concludes that emphasis should be placed on how pedagogical decisions might foster improved communication between students, and suggests that pairing social networking sites with additional pedagogical requirements could produce substantial gains.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Pro Global Science Association in its journal Published in Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research.

    Volume (Year): 13 (2017)
    Issue (Month): 1 (JUNE)
    Pages: 16-25

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:16-25
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bucharest, 6th district, 47 Fabricii Street, Quadra Place, bl.J, fl.1, ap.12

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:16-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Manuela Epure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.