IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rse/wpaper/v11y2016i1p67-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Between responsibility and starchitecture

Author

Listed:
  • Niculae Raluca Livia

    (Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Architecture, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The brand is an aggregate of elements that differentiate one product from another: name (used to identify a company, product, service or concept), logo (corporate identity), tagline (slogan) but also distinctive forms, colors, sounds, smells, tastes, movements. In architecture, we can talk about the building itself as a brand, an identity landmark (socio-cultural, historical, economic hub etc.) at community, regional, territorial or national level; building as a tool for brand promotion (commercial); the architect as brand (transmitter of valuable concepts / creator of recognizable forms). Starchitects are renowned for a particular "signature" design linked to a representative public building becoming particularly famous. After the 2008 world economic crisis lesson, public opinion questions how our buildings perform socially, environmentally and economically in sustainability terms. On the other hand, the media commercialization process is rather biased and dismissive, recently depicting the image of a sole architect-creator, as social insensitive, unethical and destructive. Is this the time for a paradigm shift and the legitimate rise of the social responsible architect, the activist type focused on locatecture and thus regaining community sympathy?

Suggested Citation

  • Niculae Raluca Livia, 2016. "Between responsibility and starchitecture," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 11(1), pages 67-73, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:67-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://reaser.eu/RePec/rse/wpaper/REASER11_8Niculaie_p67-73.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:67-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Epure (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pgsaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.