IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Between responsibility and starchitecture

Listed author(s):
  • Niculae Raluca Livia


    (Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Architecture, Bucharest, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    The brand is an aggregate of elements that differentiate one product from another: name (used to identify a company, product, service or concept), logo (corporate identity), tagline (slogan) but also distinctive forms, colors, sounds, smells, tastes, movements. In architecture, we can talk about the building itself as a brand, an identity landmark (socio-cultural, historical, economic hub etc.) at community, regional, territorial or national level; building as a tool for brand promotion (commercial); the architect as brand (transmitter of valuable concepts / creator of recognizable forms). Starchitects are renowned for a particular "signature" design linked to a representative public building becoming particularly famous. After the 2008 world economic crisis lesson, public opinion questions how our buildings perform socially, environmentally and economically in sustainability terms. On the other hand, the media commercialization process is rather biased and dismissive, recently depicting the image of a sole architect-creator, as social insensitive, unethical and destructive. Is this the time for a paradigm shift and the legitimate rise of the social responsible architect, the activist type focused on locatecture and thus regaining community sympathy?

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Pro Global Science Association in its journal Published in Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research.

    Volume (Year): 11 (2016)
    Issue (Month): 1 (June)
    Pages: 67-73

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:67-73
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bucharest, 6th district, 47 Fabricii Street, Quadra Place, bl.J, fl.1, ap.12

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rse:wpaper:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:67-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Manuela Epure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.