IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Selection Method Of Design Priority For Improving Rural Textures

Listed author(s):
  • Tohid Hatami-Khanghahi


    (Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Iran)

Registered author(s):

    The majority of valuable textures are found in rural residences. Physical design is the important part of a valuable texture improvement project. Because of the governmental policies in Iran, physical planning of improvement project is limited in specified confinements. Employing a suitable method for selection of design priorities in primary stages of project causes the improvement in the most part of the existing values. Present research offered practical experience by Author at selection method of design priorities in the Iranian village of Zonouzagh. This method was employed to register the important points on the base maps for extraction of high grade locations of the village texture for design priorities. These maps often involve historical development phases, quarter's confinements, connection between quarter's centres and passageways grading. Correct selection of design priorities for improving rural texture assures project goals and organic continuity in case village and even adjacent villages to be achieved.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Romanian Regional Science Association in its journal Romanian Journal of Regional Science.

    Volume (Year): 4 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 2 (DECEMBER)
    Pages: 95-112

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rrs:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:95-112
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rrs:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:95-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan-Vasile Ileanu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.