IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rrs/journl/v4y2010i2p95-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection Method Of Design Priority For Improving Rural Textures

Author

Listed:
  • Tohid Hatami-Khanghahi

    (Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Iran)

Abstract

The majority of valuable textures are found in rural residences. Physical design is the important part of a valuable texture improvement project. Because of the governmental policies in Iran, physical planning of improvement project is limited in specified confinements. Employing a suitable method for selection of design priorities in primary stages of project causes the improvement in the most part of the existing values. Present research offered practical experience by Author at selection method of design priorities in the Iranian village of Zonouzagh. This method was employed to register the important points on the base maps for extraction of high grade locations of the village texture for design priorities. These maps often involve historical development phases, quarter's confinements, connection between quarter's centres and passageways grading. Correct selection of design priorities for improving rural texture assures project goals and organic continuity in case village and even adjacent villages to be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Tohid Hatami-Khanghahi, 2010. "Selection Method Of Design Priority For Improving Rural Textures," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 4(2), pages 99-112, DECEMBER.
    • Handle: RePEc:rrs:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:95-112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rjrs.ase.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/V42/V425.Tohid.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Design Priority; Improvement; Valuable Texture; Zonouzagh;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rrs:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:95-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan-Vasile Ileanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.