IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v13y2018i2p65-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis On Public Transport Systems In European Capitals: Bucharest & Berlin

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru-Mihai BUGHEANU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Piata Romana 6, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The present study examines the public transport networks in two European capitals, specifically Bucharest and Berlin. The public transport systems of interest in this research displays similar characteristics regarding the number of users, transport vehicles, geographic area served or provided services. The main objective of the paper is to perform a comparative evaluation on the two transport systems, including here specific features, transportation performances and costs, travellers perceptions towards the public transport operators and so on. The purpose of the research was to identify two European capitals, which presents similarities in terms of their public transport systems. For this reason, Berlin and Bucharest metropolis were selected. The results of the analysis can be used to perform a more thorough comparative research on public transport systems across the European Union, or in direct comparison with other metropolitan areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru-Mihai BUGHEANU, 2018. "Comparative Analysis On Public Transport Systems In European Capitals: Bucharest & Berlin," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(2), pages 65-75, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:65-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no132/5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chitresh KUMAR & Anirban GANGULY, 2018. "Travelling Together But Differently: Comparing Variations In Public Transit User Mode Choice Attributes Across New Delhi And New York," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(3), pages 54-73, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:65-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.