IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Management and Risks Administration


  • Vasile ZECHERU

    () (The University Of Agronomic Science and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania)


Romania’s ability to attract financing from the European Union budget has proven very difficult in the last years. By comparing us, starting from this criterion, with the neighborly countries (Hungary, Czech Republic, Poland), it is clear we have serious deficiencies regarding not only the approaches and representations, but also the ability to define and rollback projects in accordance with the applicable standards. In the series of frequent deficiencies is listed also what we call risk management. In order to obtain a complete success, project management presupposes, therefore, inclusively the adequate administration of the risk. In this matter, the three fundamental purposes could be: (i) identifying the probable events which could have an unwanted impact over the results; (ii) the careful and active monitoring of the identified risks; (iii) adopting certain prevention/correction measures and enforcing the internal/managerial control bound to offer full guarantees regarding the accomplishment of the pre-established objects. In case of a Project Management Unit (short for PMU) that benefits from European funds, the realization of the objective of avoiding the application of certain financial corrections is directly proportional with the efficacy of the risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasile ZECHERU, 2013. "Project Management and Risks Administration," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(3), pages 450-458, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:450-458

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    internal audit; internal/managerial control; level of impact; prevention/correction decision; risk probability; total risk score.;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rmcimn:v:14:y:2013:i:3:p:450-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marian Nastase). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.