IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/rampas/v2024y2024i42p6-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness Of Governance Vs Social Development: A Multivariate Approach To Countries’ Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana LIASHENKO

    (Professor, DSc in Economics, PhD, Universidad de Sevilla, Faculty of Economic Sciences and Entrepreneurship, Av. de Ramón y Cajal, 1, 41004, Seville, Spain)

  • Olena MYKHAILOVSKA

    (DSc in Public Administration, Management and Administration Department, Chernihiv Polytechnic National University, Shevchenko Str., 95, 14053, Chernihiv, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana SHESTAKOVSKA

    (DSc in Public Administration, Docent, Chernihiv Institute of Information, Business and Law, Higher Educational Institution «Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University», 27 Remisnycha St., 14000, Chernihiv, Ukraine)

  • Serhiy SELYUTIN

    (Candidate of Economic Sciences, Chernihiv Institute of Information, Business and Law, Higher Educational Institution «Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University», 27 Remisnycha St., 14000, Chernihiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Effective governance is pivotal in fostering social development and economic growth in modern societies. This paper explores the intricate relationship between social progress and government administration quality, aiming to identify the critical determinants influencing countries' social progress. We hypothesise that effective governance exerts a comprehensive influence on countries' social progress and vice versa, not only at the level of partial correlation. Drawing on the Social Progress Index (SPI) and Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), we employ discriminant analysis to understand how different dimensions of government effectiveness contribute to social development (Androniceanu & Georgescu, 2023). The study finds that several factors significantly influence social progress, including Voice and Accountability, Political Stability, Control of Corruption, Regulatory Quality, and Government Effectiveness. By analysing data from 167 countries, we classify nations into high, medium, and low social progress groups based on SPI scores. The discriminant analysis model achieves an accuracy of 92.2% in classifying countries, indicating the robustness of the approach. Furthermore, multivariate Wilk’s Tests of Significance reveal that variables related to water and sanitation, access to basic knowledge, access to information and communications, environmental quality, personal safety, and access to advanced education are determinants of social progress. The discriminant functions derived from the analysis provide insights into the relative importance of these variables in determining countries' social progress levels. Our findings underscore the importance of effective governance in driving countries' social development outcomes. By identifying key factors that contribute to social progress, policymakers can design targeted strategies to enhance governance effectiveness and promote sustainable societal advancement. The study contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence of the relationship between government efficiency and social development on a global scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana LIASHENKO & Olena MYKHAILOVSKA & Tetiana SHESTAKOVSKA & Serhiy SELYUTIN, 2024. "Effectiveness Of Governance Vs Social Development: A Multivariate Approach To Countries’ Classification," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2024(42), pages 6-24.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2024:y:2024:i:42:p:6-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ramp.ase.ro/vol42/42-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C3 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:rampas:v:2024:y:2024:i:42:p:6-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Androniceanu Armenia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.