IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mrpase/v2y2010i2p217-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study Of The Experience Of Developed Countries In The Public Policy Process: Spain, Portugal, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela PACESILA

    () (Department of Public Administration, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The paper focuses on the specifics of public policies process in three countries: two of them are European Union members - Spain, and Portugal - and the third is located on the American continent - Canada. Choosing the three countries is due to the fact that the issues presented have a common point: they focus on the procedures for the transmission of documents in the framework of the process rather than on the activities of the ministries for public policies development and analysis. The last part of the paper examines comparatively the three countries described above (Spain, Portugal and Canada), highlighting similarities and differences between them. The specific elements of the public policies process of these countries are also described here, which could be used also in other countries in order to improve the process and to better meet citizens' needs and problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela PACESILA, 2010. "Comparative Study Of The Experience Of Developed Countries In The Public Policy Process: Spain, Portugal, Canada," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2(2), pages 217-233, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:217-233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mrp.ase.ro/no22/f7.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    initial draft of the public policy proposal; agenda setting; internal and external negotiation; evaluation culture; re-examination of public policy.;

    JEL classification:

    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mrpase:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:217-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Colesca Sofia). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.