IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/bemann/v15y2025i3p80-92.html

Life Insurance Agents’ Intention Of Selling Health Insurance To Unhealthy Customers: The Case Of Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Ci-Yun HONG

    (Feng Chia University, Taichung City, Taiwan)

  • Chang-Jung KUO

    (Feng Chia University, Taichung City, Taiwan)

  • Lu-Ming TSENG

    (Feng Chia University, Taichung City, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study examines life insurance agents’ awareness of ethical issues, ethical attitudes, and behavioral intentions toward selling health insurance to unhealthy customers. The study further examines how ethical attitudes and intentions are influenced by sales compensation, performance pressure, and underwriting policies of insurance companies. Full-time life insurance agents completed questionnaires during regular meetings. Using partial least square (PLS) regression, the results indicate that awareness of ethical issues influences the ethical attitudes and behavioral intentions of life insurance agents. Ethical attitudes are the most important variable affecting behavioral intentions. The study also finds that the stringency of the life insurance company's underwriting policy is a significant factor influencing life insurance agents’ ethical attitudes. Life insurance agents who knowingly sell health insurance to unhealthy customers may cause financial harm to the life insurance companies, and other honest customers may need to pay higher rates in the future as a result of this behavior. The findings of this study may serve as a reference for insurance regulators and life insurance companies. The findings also add to the literature on insurance fraud and support the idea that underwriting policies can influence the ethical attitudes of life insurance agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Ci-Yun HONG & Chang-Jung KUO & Lu-Ming TSENG, 2025. "Life Insurance Agents’ Intention Of Selling Health Insurance To Unhealthy Customers: The Case Of Taiwan," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(3), pages 80-92, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:80-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://beman.ase.ro/no153/6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Eling & Ruo Jia & Yi Yao, 2017. "Between-Group Adverse Selection: Evidence From Group Critical Illness Insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(2), pages 771-809, June.
    2. Pablo Ruiz-Palomino & Ricardo Martinez-Cañas, 2011. "Supervisor Role Modeling, Ethics-Related Organizational Policies, and Employee Ethical Intention: The Moderating Impact of Moral Ideology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 653-668, September.
    3. Wang, Hong & Zhang, Licheng & Yip, Winnie & Hsiao, William, 2006. "Adverse selection in a voluntary Rural Mutual Health Care health insurance scheme in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(5), pages 1236-1245, September.
    4. Georges Dionne & Christian Gourieroux & Charles Vanasse, 2001. "Testing for Evidence of Adverse Selection in the Automobile Insurance Market: A Comment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 109(2), pages 444-473, April.
    5. Lu-Ming Tseng & Chia-Lin Kuo, 2014. "Customers’ attitudes toward insurance frauds: an application of Adams’ equity theory," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 1038-1054, November.
    6. Maria Polyakova, 2016. "Regulation of Insurance with Adverse Selection and Switching Costs: Evidence from Medicare Part D," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(3), pages 165-195, July.
    7. Robin, Donald P. & Reidenbach, R. Eric & Forrest, P. J., 1996. "The perceived importance of an ethical issue as an influence on the ethical decision-making of ad managers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 17-28, January.
    8. Jaana Woiceshyn, 2011. "A Model for Ethical Decision Making in Business: Reasoning, Intuition, and Rational Moral Principles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 311-323, December.
    9. Alma Cohen & Peter Siegelman, 2010. "Testing for Adverse Selection in Insurance Markets," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(1), pages 39-84, March.
    10. Mark S. Schwartz, 2016. "Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 755-776, December.
    11. Powell, David & Goldman, Dana, 2021. "Disentangling moral hazard and adverse selection in private health insurance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 141-160.
    12. Jana Craft, 2013. "A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 221-259, October.
    13. Valentine, Sean & Godkin, Lynn, 2019. "Moral intensity, ethical decision making, and whistleblowing intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 277-288.
    14. Scott Colwell & Michael Zyphur & Marshall Schminke, 2011. "When does Ethical Code Enforcement Matter in the Inter-Organizational Context? The Moderating Role of Switching Costs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 47-58, November.
    15. David M. Cutler & Sarah J. Reber, 1998. "Paying for Health Insurance: The Trade-Off between Competition and Adverse Selection," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(2), pages 433-466.
    16. Ivy Munoko & Helen L. Brown-Liburd & Miklos Vasarhelyi, 2020. "The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 209-234, November.
    17. Lu-Ming Tseng, 2017. "To sell or not to sell: the insurance agents’ attitude toward high-risk customers," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 44(12), pages 1856-1870, December.
    18. Lu-Ming Tseng & Chia-Lin Kuo, 2014. "Customers’ attitudes toward insurance frauds: an application of Adams’ equity theory," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(11), pages 1038-1054, November.
    19. Haithem Zourrig & Jeongsoo Park, 2019. "The effects of cultural tightness and perceived unfairness on Japanese consumers’ attitude towards insurance fraud: the mediating effect of rationalization," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 21-30, June.
    20. Victoria Bush & Alan J. Bush & Jared Oakley & John E. Cicala, 2017. "The Sales Profession as a Subculture: Implications for Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 549-565, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Soika, 2018. "Moral Hazard and Advantageous Selection in Private Disability Insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(1), pages 97-125, January.
    2. Yen-Chih Chen & Wen-Yen Hsu & Carol Troy, 2024. "Unpriced and unseen: private information and taxi insurance purchases in Taiwan," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 49(4), pages 831-867, October.
    3. Nathaniel Hendren & Camille Landais & Johannes Spinnewijn, 2021. "Choice in Insurance Markets: A Pigouvian Approach to Social Insurance Design," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 457-486, August.
    4. Mark S. Schwartz, 2016. "Ethical Decision-Making Theory: An Integrated Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 755-776, December.
    5. Sophia Kusyk & Mark S. Schwartz, 2025. "Moral Intensity: It Is What Is, But What Is It? A Critical Review of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 487-508, September.
    6. Bedsworth, Fredrick & Neal, Daniel R. & Portillo, Javier E. & Willardsen, Kevin, 2021. "Asymmetric information and insurance: An experimental approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Tomas J. Philipson & George Zanjani, 2013. "Economic Analysis of Risk and Uncertainty induced by Health Shocks: A Review and Extension," NBER Working Papers 19005, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Xiaoqi Zhang & Yi Chen & Yi Yao, 2021. "Dynamic information asymmetry in micro health insurance: implications for sustainability," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(3), pages 468-507, July.
    9. Fey, Jan-Christian & Schmeiser, Hato & Schreiber, Florian, 2024. "Optimal insurance deductibles under limited information," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 202-221.
    10. Rahizah Sulaiman & Paul Toulson & David Brougham & Frieder Lempp & Jarrod Haar, 2022. "The Role of Religiosity in Ethical Decision-Making: A Study on Islam and the Malaysian Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 297-313, August.
    11. Chen, An & Li, Hong & Schultze, Mark B., 2023. "Optimal longevity risk transfer under asymmetric information," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Luca Casali, Gian & Perano, Mirko, 2021. "Forty years of research on factors influencing ethical decision making: Establishing a future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 614-630.
    13. Evelyne Rousselet & Bérangère Brial & Romain Cadario & Amina Béji-Bécheur, 2020. "Moral Intensity, Issue Characteristics, and Ethical Issue Recognition in Sales Situations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 347-363, May.
    14. Kremslehner, Daniela & Muermann, Alexander, 2016. "Asymmetric information in automobile insurance: Evidence from driving behavior," CFS Working Paper Series 543, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    15. Marcos Luís Procópio, 2022. "Qualitative empirical research on ethical decision-making in organizations: Revisiting Waters, Bird, and Chant’s pioneering methodological approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1661-1680, June.
    16. Bruno Lussier & Nawar Chaker & Nathaniel Hartmann & Deva Rangarajan, 2022. "Lone wolf tendency and ethical behaviors in sales: Examining the roles of perceived supervisor support and salesperson self-efficacy," Post-Print hal-03707345, HAL.
    17. Michael Geruso & Timothy J. Layton & Grace McCormack & Mark Shepard, 2023. "The Two-Margin Problem in Insurance Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(2), pages 237-257, March.
    18. Marli Gonan Božac & Katarina Kostelić & Morena Paulišić & Charles G. Smith, 2021. "Business Ethics Decision-Making: Examining Partial Reflective Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    19. de Meza, David & Webb, David C., 2017. "False diagnoses: pitfalls of testing for asymmetric information in insurance markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65744, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Tongyu Meng & Jamie Newth & Christine Woods, 2022. "Ethical Sensemaking in Impact Investing: Reasons and Motives in the Chinese Renewable Energy Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1091-1117, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:80-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zamfir Andreea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.