Author
Abstract
Introduction. The article presents the author's tools for evaluating tools (or projects) of innovative regional development, which expands traditional ideas about the analysis of the effectiveness of projects. The relevance of developing approaches to assessing innovative development tools is determined primarily by the need to improve methods for forming a package of priority state and regional programs that will have a positive impact on the development of innovative systems. It is worth noting that most of the assessment systems used, as a rule, provide only a financial and economic assessment of the effectiveness of the project (or tool), which may contradict the systematic analysis of the object and indicate the one-sided nature of the study. In addition, the concept of sustainable development assumes a balanced solution to socio-economic problems that should take into account the dynamic development of the economy and the social sphere while preserving the potential of the country's natural complex. This leads to the conclusion that it is necessary to expand the tools used to assess the effectiveness of implemented programs (projects, tools, etc.), which makes the problem of evaluating innovative development tools relevant at the present time. The purpose of the study is to develop a toolkit that allows evaluating innovative development tools in terms of both financial and social consequences. To describe the theoretical foundations of the research, elements of deduction and induction methods, analysis and synthesis, and the classification method were used. Methods of analogy and abstraction were used to test the proposed tools. The "traffic light" method and the use of expert analysis will be used to classify and rank projects. The results of the conducted research have generally shown that the inclusion of the "equity" indicator in the system of assessment of innovative development tools makes it possible to consider it (the tool) from all sides, including in the context of environmental impact, which is consistent with the concept of sustainable development. Conclusions. In accordance with the results obtained from the approbation of the proposed methodology for evaluating innovative development tools, the authors draw conclusions on the application of the assessment methodology in practice, some of its limitations, and outline areas of future research within this approach.
Suggested Citation
Oleg L. Goyher (Гойхер О.Л.) & Ekaterina M. Gusarova (Гусарова Е.М.), 2025.
"Evaluation of innovative systems development instruments [Оценка Инструментов Развития Инновационных Систем],"
State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 1, pages 32-42.
Handle:
RePEc:rnp:smmscn:s2513
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:smmscn:s2513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.