Author
Abstract
This study is devoted to studying the key priorities of the SCO member states in the field of information security, as well as identifying the role of geopolitical contradictions and their impact on cooperation. Aim and Tasks. Based on the theoretical material and practical analysis of the rating and official documents, to identify the specifics of cooperation between the SCO member states in matters of information security. To analyze the indicators of innovative development of the SCO member states in the Global Innovation Index (GII), identify leaders in this field; to study the level of information security of the participating countries; to identify contradictions and to consider the general priorities of the policy of the states of cooperation in the field of information security. Methods. The work is based on the analysis of official documents, the comparative method of quantitative indicators, the case study method and synthesis. Results. The study showed that, depending on the level of innovation development, the SCO states see threats in the information space differently. Thus, for countries with technological leadership, cybersecurity, the establishment of common standards and the development of international cooperation are of paramount importance. Less technologically advanced states focus on preventing and eliminating threats of a domestic political nature. The factor of geopolitical contradictions has an impact on the cooperation of individual states within the organization in the development of the ICT sector (for example of Pakistan and China). However, within the framework of the SCO, states strive for constructive dialogue and the development of common approaches to regulating the field of information security. Conclusions. The results of the study demonstrate the importance of the level of technological development of the SCO member states in building their own information policy and proposed initiatives within the SCO. China and Russia are the undisputed technological leaders in the organization. As their ally, the Republic of Belarus strives to improve its information security system. At the same time, Pakistan, being a geopolitical opponent of India, has established cooperation with China on the development of the ICT sector within the framework of the “One Belt — One Road” project. Analyzing the trend of innovative development, we can note the significant successes of India, Iran and Kazakhstan. In the case of Kazakhstan, it is important to point out that the republic is a technological leader in the Central Asian region, and therefore the issues of building information security are a strategic focus. Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan are focusing on solving internal problems in the information space, but they are actively putting forward their initiatives in this area within the SCO
Suggested Citation
Shcherban, Anastasia (Щербань, Анастасия), 2025.
"Information Security Policy in the SCO Member States [Политика Обеспечения Информационной Безопасности В Государствах — Членах Шос],"
Eurasian integration: economy, law, politics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, issue 1, pages 159-170.
Handle:
RePEc:rnp:eurint:et2514
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:eurint:et2514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.