IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnp/ecosci/es2016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problems of Formal-mechanistic Approach to Identification of Plagiarism in Scientific Works
[Проблемы Формально-Механистического Подхода К Выявлению Плагиата В Научных Работах]

Author

Listed:
  • Gelman, Viktor (Гельман, Виктор)

    (North-West State Medical University named after I. I. Mechnikov)

Abstract

The effectiveness of research teams and scientists is largely estimated by their publication activity. One indicator of the quality of scientific work is the absence of plagiarism. The purpose of this paper was to consider the problems that arise with the formal-mechanistic approach to the detection of plagiarism in scientific papers. The questions of the correlation of meaning and plagiarism; quoting your own work; quoting and inaccurate quoting; the use of generally accepted expressions, laws, definitions; the need to refine anti-plagiarism systems are considered. It is shown that due to the fact that anti-plagiarism systems do not analyze the meaning of the text, “overdiagnosis” occurs. As a result of an uncritical approach to the conclusions of such systems, the writing of scientific papers becomes more complicated. The necessity of developing more accurate criteria for determining what is plagiarized in scientific papers is noted. Some suggestions were made to reduce the shortcomings of the formal approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Gelman, Viktor (Гельман, Виктор), 2020. "Problems of Formal-mechanistic Approach to Identification of Plagiarism in Scientific Works [Проблемы Формально-Механистического Подхода К Выявлению Плагиата В Научных Работах]," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 6, pages 180-185.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.ranepa.ru/rnp/ecosci/es2016.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnp:ecosci:es2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RANEPA maintainer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aneeeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.