IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

The Economic Feasibility of Shale Oil: An Activity Analysis

  • Neil R. Ericsson
  • Peter Morgan

Given the current state of technology, the existing resource supplies, and environmental constraints, we examine how much shale oil could be profitably produced in the Western United States, what processes would be used, and which constraints would be binding in long-run equilibrium. Using an activity analysis model, we show that production of over 15 million barrels of shale oil per day (five-sixths of present U.S. oil consumption) is a profitable activity when the price of oil is $18 per barrel (1975 dollars). In testing the sensitivity of our results, we find that, even under quite conservative assumptions, production of two million barrels per day is economically feasible in the long run when the selling price of oil exceeds $12 per barrel.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See for details.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by The RAND Corporation in its journal Bell Journal of Economics.

Volume (Year): 9 (1978)
Issue (Month): 2 (Autumn)
Pages: 457-487

in new window

Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:9:y:1978:i:autumn:p:457-487
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:9:y:1978:i:autumn:p:457-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.