IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/sccars/022087.html

Comparative Study of Agricultural Extension Methods Used by the Public and Private Sectors Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic in Myanmar: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nwaye Ei Khing Phyu

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Htar Htar Win

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Htet Oo Khin

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Win Mar Htay

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Hein Zaw

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Chaw Su Aye

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Nyein Nyein Htwe

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Sein Lwin Aung

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Soe Paing Oo

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

  • Nan Yu Maw

    (Department of Agricultural Extension, Yezin Agricultural University)

Abstract

Agricultural extension plays a crucial role in the development of the agricultural sector and the dissemination of agricultural information. There are three extension methods, namely individual, group, and mass methods, that facilitate communication between extension workers and farmers. The study was conducted to examine the agricultural extension methods used by the public and private sectors before and during COVID-19 pandemic, and to investigate farmers’ preference of agricultural extension methods used by the public and private sectors before and during COVID-19 pandemic in the Zeyarthiri township, Nay Pyi Taw Union Territory. A total of 60 respondents from three villages were interviewed using structured interview questionnaires for quantitative and qualitative data in July 2022. The demographic characteristics, agricultural extension methods received by farmers, and farmers’ preference of agricultural extension methods by the public and private sectors were all collected. The descriptive analysis and paired sample t-test were used to compare agricultural extension methods used by both sectors. The Chi-square Friedman test was also conducted to analyze farmers’ preference on extension methods with a 5-point Likert scale (1932) before and during the pandemic in SPSS. In terms of farmers’ preference, they mostly liked farm and home visits under the individual method used by both sectors among other extension methods in this study area. It indicates that individuals can speak with extension staff members face-to-face during farm and home visits about anything they want to know. During COVID-19 pandemic, the farmers mostly preferred “TV” under the mass method. It means that TV is the best way, not only for COVID-19 restrictions but also for quick access to agricultural information during COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Nwaye Ei Khing Phyu & Htar Htar Win & Htet Oo Khin & Win Mar Htay & Hein Zaw & Chaw Su Aye & Nyein Nyein Htwe & Sein Lwin Aung & Soe Paing Oo & Nan Yu Maw, 2024. "Comparative Study of Agricultural Extension Methods Used by the Public and Private Sectors Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic in Myanmar: A Case Study," Agricultural & Rural Studies, SCC Press, vol. 2(2), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:sccars:022087
    DOI: 10.59978/ar02020009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sccpress.com/ars/article/view/52/195
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.59978/ar02020009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:sccars:022087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rui Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sccpress.com/ars .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.