Author
Listed:
- Alejandro de las Heras
(Independent Researcher)
- Emmanuel Castillo-Villavicencio
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)
- Marina Islas-Espinoza
(Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)
Abstract
Spain is at the forefront of organic agriculture in Europe and entering carbon farming but is facing rural depopulation, draughts, soil erosion and pervasive glyphosate pollution in water. These are factors affecting the rural ecosystem, which is simulated here as a 4-species Lotka-Volterra model from 2030 through 2100. The role of interstitial permaculture (IP) in solving for land fragmentation and loss of local agricultural knowledge and practices, is explored. Landscape ecology, and especially the role of hedgerows in bocage and dehesa landscapes give credence to IP as a form of agroforestry. The Lotka-Volterra simulation captures the high interconnectedness of species in the local agroecosystem. The simulation also provides insight into the limits of a viable transition to sustainable agriculture: reforestation is fostered by the inflow of permaculturists, but wolves cannot by themselves stem the tide of boar growth. Rather, human intervention throughout Europe seems to be required. Eventually, the model manages to bring boar, wolf and human populations to a certain balance, oscillating near the carrying capacity of the system, but tree populations keep well below carrying capacity, suggesting more reforestation efforts. The ecobenefits resulting from the ecosystem’s evolution fostered by permaculture were found to be in terms of soil protection hence soil organic carbon sequestration. A striking suggestion of the model regarding herbivory is that boar meat should be consumed by humans, a practice in the area during the Holocene, and supported by new research in Europe.
Suggested Citation
Alejandro de las Heras & Emmanuel Castillo-Villavicencio & Marina Islas-Espinoza, 2024.
"Repopulating and Rewilding a Historical Agricultural Landscape: 2030–2100 Transition,"
Agricultural & Rural Studies, SCC Press, vol. 2(4), November.
Handle:
RePEc:ris:sccars:022076
DOI: 10.59978/ar02040022
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:sccars:022076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rui Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sccpress.com/ars .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.