IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/qjatoe/023815.html

Assessing Provincial Energy Efficiency Considering the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases: A Three-Level Cross-Border Approach in Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed Hamid reza Zakeri

    (PhD student , Department of Economic Development and Planning, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Sajjad Faraji Dizaji

    (Associate Professor, Department of Economic Development and Planning, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Abbas Assari Arani

    (Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)

  • Hoseein Sadeghi Saghdel

    (Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

This study aims to measure energy efficiency and decompose the sources of inefficiency across 31 provinces of Iran during 202 by employing a three-level cross-frontier framework based on the SBM–VRS model. In the model, capital stock, labor, and energy consumption measured in barrels of oil equivalent are included as inputs; gross provincial product is specified as the desirable output; and the social costs of emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrogen oxides are incorporated as undesirable outputs. Provincial efficiency is calculated at three levels: the climate–economic-sector frontier, the economic-sector frontier, and the national cross-frontier, and overall inefficiency is decomposed into managerial, climatic-regional, and technological-structural components. The results show that average energy efficiency decreases as the reference set expands, from 0.926 at the climate–economic-sector level to 0.742 at the economic-sector level and 0.46 at the national cross-frontier level. Only seven provinces—Ilam, Bushehr, Tehran, South Khorasan, North Khorasan, Khuzestan, and Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad—are efficient at all three levels. The national technical energy-saving potential in 2021 is estimated at approximately 885.5 million barrels of oil equivalent, of which 13 percent is attributable to managerial inefficiency, 46.3 percent to the climatic-regional component, and 40.7 percent to the technological-structural component. Therefore, the majority of the potential for improving efficiency is associated with the gap between regional and technological frontiers, and a uniform policy approach for all provinces is not appropriate. Improving energy efficiency requires a combination of better consumption management, development of infrastructure suited to regional conditions, and modernization of production technology and structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed Hamid reza Zakeri & Sajjad Faraji Dizaji & Abbas Assari Arani & Hoseein Sadeghi Saghdel, 2026. "Assessing Provincial Energy Efficiency Considering the Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases: A Three-Level Cross-Border Approach in Iran," Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Business, University of Tabriz, vol. 13(3), pages 81-112.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:qjatoe:023815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecoj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_22196_54727a6bb040806e2af258b2f6f9edb6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:qjatoe:023815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sakineh Sojoodi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetabir.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.