IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ppipsg/022139.html

CPC or CCP? : Historical Trajectories and International Comparisons in Translating zhongguo gongchandang

Author

Listed:
  • Keke Ning

    (Renmin University of China, Beijing, China)

  • Kejie Yu

    (China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China)

Abstract

Debates over the English rendering of zhongguo gongchandang (中国共产党) as either 'the Communist Party of China' (CPC) or 'the Chinese Communist Party' (CCP) have gained renewed attention in both Chinese and international scholarship. Yet, a systematic, historically grounded explanation remains elusive. This article traces the evolution of English translations of zhongguo gongchandang in official Party and government documents over the past century, situating these choices within broader patterns of political party naming worldwide. It examines the historical, theoretical, and practical considerations that informed the adoption of 'the Communist Party of China' as the Party’s official English designation. While acknowledging that 'the Chinese Communist Party' does not inherently carry negative connotations, the article argues—drawing on the historical experience of the international communist movement—that a party name should be distinctive and definitive. On this basis, 'the Communist Party of China' emerges as the most appropriate English rendering of zhongguo gongchandang.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:ris:ppipsg:022139
DOI: 10.47297/ppipsg2025010203
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://api.ppipress.com/journal/article/preview?doi=10.47297/ppipsg2025010203
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://porcelainpublishing.com/journal/PSG/1/2/10.47297/ppipsg2025010203
Download Restriction: no

File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47297/ppipsg2025010203?utm_source=ideas
LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ppipsg:022139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Xiaomei Chang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://porcelainpublishing.com/journal/PSG .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.