IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jofitr/0177.html

Differences in the measurement and structure of wealth using alternative data sources: the case of the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Zoe Oldfield

    (Institute for Fiscal Studies, UK)

  • Eva Sierminska

    (CEPS/INSTEAD Research Institute, Luxembourg)

Abstract

In this paper, we identify methodological differences and similarities in the measurement of wealth using survey data constructed for different purposes in the U.K. and separately for England. The focus of the paper is on two prominent surveys in the U.K.: the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA) and the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). We find conceptual differences in the measurement of financial assets and debt. At the same time, striking similarities exist in the measurement of non-financial assets. For the most part, many differences arise in the tails of the distributions of wealth. Comparable definitions of overall wealth in the surveys lead us to find a 10% and 3% difference in mean and conditional median of total net worth, respectively. Reassuring is the fact that inequality results carried out with the two surveys support one another and quantile regression shows that the distribution of total net worth across demographic groups is similar in the two surveys.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoe Oldfield & Eva Sierminska, 2009. "Differences in the measurement and structure of wealth using alternative data sources: the case of the UK," Journal of Financial Transformation, Capco Institute, vol. 26, pages 42-50.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:jofitr:0177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.capco.com/files/pdf/1595/01_Part%201/07_Differences%20in%20the%20measurement%20and%20structure%20of%20wealth%20using%20alternative%20data%20sources:%20the%20case%20of%20the%20U.K..pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank A. Cowell & Philippe Kerm, 2015. "Wealth Inequality: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 671-710, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jofitr:0177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Shahin Shojai The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Prof. Shahin Shojai to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.capco.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.