Author
Listed:
- DAVOYAN Samson
(Doctor of Economic Sciences,)
- SARGSYAN Arpine
(Armenian State University of Economics, Gyumri branch, Chair of Theory of Economics, lecturer. In 2010-2014 bachelor of international economic relations and in 2014-2016 master of Finance at Armenian State University of Economics Gyumri branch Gyumri, (ARMENIA))
Abstract
Authorities of different countries develop and implement various socio-economic reforms. All those reforms pursue one goal; to respond relevantly to internal and external challenges, maintain sustainability in not only economic, but also social and political areas. Socio-economic reforms have made structural adjustments worldwide. These adjustments are addressed to multidimensional economic and social issues. Not only social, but also economic development, sustainability and international competitiveness of a country is widely dependent on effective implementation of socio-economic reforms in an observed country. There are different methodological approaches in quantitative assessment of reforms. These methods are proposed by different international organizations, researchers and research centers. Among all methods, index assessments are used widely. Thus, economic reforms are assessed though many indexes (i.e. Global Competitiveness Index, Global Innovation Index, Economic Freedom Index, Human Development Index, Social progress index etc.). The main objective of our research is to develop a new methodology, which addresses to development of an integral index of various reforms that will include as many indexes as possible that partially assess different areas of reforms. With this paper, we aim to assess how effectively have governments of the observed economies in transition (Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria and Slovakia) implemented social-economic reforms. We create a new and unique methodology that enables researchers to make comparative analysis on the many aspects of reforms and transformations. The results of the integral index of Reforms give an opportunity to define directions in which countries have implemented reforms more effectively compared to others and in which direction reforms have implemented less efficiently for each country observed
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:joeasd:0099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marijan Cingula (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eclinicalsci.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.