Author
Abstract
The guaranteed minimum income GMI is a recognized tool in practice of reducing poverty and its severe and extreme forms among people facing this social risk. In order to ensure the guaranteed minimum income necessary to cover the needs of persons who are at a certain moment unable to ensure a minimum subsistence, a social aid is granted in addition to the monthly net income of the family or the single person. The purpose of this program was to provide some form of social assistance to these people in difficulty, who have very low incomes or even no incomes. The guaranteed minimum income is thus the most important measure taken into action to reduce poverty and social exclusion, which has a major impact on the existence of the most vulnerable people affected by this social risk. On the other hand, the program aims to increase participation of the recipients in the labour market, by containing certain activation components. Over time, it has been proven that these activation elements are not sufficiently stimulating to mobilize beneficiaries of social aid to transition from their social assistance state to labour market participant (with reference to the activable persons, respectively the working-age people with work capacity). For this reason, more acutely, the guaranteed minimum income is increasingly seen as an incentive tool to encourage work among activable recipients. Thus, the program is aimed at stimulation the social aid beneficiaries in their transition into employment and to get out of the social assistance network. In this sense, one solution is to insert more stimulating activation elements in the GMI program, which would support poverty alleviation among these people and families and increase their level of wellbeing. The paper considers an ex-ante evaluation of the introduction in the guaranteed minimum income program of an incentive to work, more active that the present one, and to estimate some effects that this simulation of introducing a pro-active work incentive in the social aid could have in contributing to poverty alleviation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:joeasd:0045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marijan Cingula (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.eclinicalsci.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.