IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jfaafi/0027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management And Performance Of Penson Fund Administrators In Nigeria

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This study examined the effect of enterprise risk management on the performance of Pension Pund Administrators in Nigeria. The study employed combination ofsurvey research design and ex-post facto. The unit price was obtained from Pencom annual reports as at December 31, 2019. The statistical tools employed in the data analysis is simple regression and correlation analysis test statistic with the use of SPSS 23 version. The results from the models were divided. Some factors of EFNI were negative while some were positive on fund performance. It also revealed that level of implementation of enterprise risk management has improved among PM-As in Nigeria. The recommendation includes that the PFAS in Nigeria should employ robust enferprise risk management practices that will improve their fund performance as they face competition, Offs should focus more on those roriohJes that gave them positive effect on fund performance, such roriohJes are objective setting, event identification, risk response, control activities and regulatory review. The study also recommended that Pencom should make it mandatory for both Board and Management to attend enterprise risk management training to improve the system since it is a new development in our clime.

Suggested Citation

  • Lateef Kolawole', Fijabi, & Godwin Emmanuel, Oyedokun,, 2020. "Risk Management And Performance Of Penson Fund Administrators In Nigeria," Journal of Forensic Accounting & Fraud Investigation (JFAFI), Association of Forensic Accounting Researchers (AFAR), vol. 5(2), pages 98-130, July - De.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:jfaafi:0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afarng.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Journal-of-forensic-Vol.5-Issue-2-July-Dec._compressed.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CRO; ERM; Fund performance; Pencom; PFA; PFC;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jfaafi:0027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Akanbi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afarnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.