IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/jaccad/023587.html

Conceptualizing Auditors' Cognitive Heterogeneity: and Analyzing Its Role in Auditor Professional Skepticism
[مفهوم‌پردازی ناهمگونی شناختی حسابرسان و تحلیل نقش آن در تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرس]

Author

Listed:
  • Saeed Inanloo Moranloo

    (Ph.D. Student, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran.)

  • Meysam Arabzadeh

    (Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran)

  • Mehdi Safari Gerayli

    (Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, BG.C., Islamic Azad University, Bandargaz, Iran)

  • Hossein Jabbary

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran)

  • Mohammad Reza Mohagheghi

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Kas.C., Islamic Azad University, Kashan, Iran)

Abstract

Amid the inherent ambiguities and complexities of professional decision-making, cognitive dissonance in auditors' judgments distorts perceptions of financial realities. This study explores the hidden layers of cognition and the impact on the auditing profession. It presents a model of auditors’ cognitive dissonance and examines its role in fostering professional skepticism. Employing both qualitative and quantitative methods tailored to data collection needs, the study identifies components of auditors’ cognitive dissonance through content analysis and expert interviews informed by researcher-developed questionnaires. Professional skepticism was assessed via a standardized questionnaire. Additionally, structural equation modeling via partial least squares (PLS-SEM) tested the research hypotheses. The findings uncovered a thematic hierarchy comprising three overarching themes: conflict in cognitive values, heterogeneity in structural mechanisms, and inhibitory individual mechanisms; seven organizing themes; and 31 basic themes, which dynamically interact to form a comprehensive pattern of cognitive dissonance in the auditing profession. The quantitative results further revealed that auditors' cognitive dissonance exerts a negative and significant influence on professional skepticism. These findings offer pathways to improving audit processes, reducing judgment errors, and enhancing financial reporting quality. Thus, this study stands as an inspiring and practical reference for researchers, auditors, and standard setters.

Suggested Citation

  • Saeed Inanloo Moranloo & Meysam Arabzadeh & Mehdi Safari Gerayli & Hossein Jabbary & Mohammad Reza Mohagheghi, 2025. "Conceptualizing Auditors' Cognitive Heterogeneity: and Analyzing Its Role in Auditor Professional Skepticism [مفهوم‌پردازی ناهمگونی شناختی حسابرسان و تحلیل نقش آن در تردید حرفه‌ای حسابرس]," Journal of Accounting Advances (JAA), Shiraz University, vol. 17(2), pages 81-123, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:jaccad:023587
    DOI: 10.22099/jaa.2025.53469.2515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/article_8375.html?lang=en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22099/jaa.2025.53469.2515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jaccad:023587. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amin Nazemi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jaa.shirazu.ac.ir/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.