IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Should Small Countries Join an Existing Monetary Union ?

Listed author(s):
  • M. von Furstenberg, George


    (Fordham University)

  • P. Teolis, David

    (General Motors Corporation)

We explore the welfare consequences of the alternative monetary and exchangerate regimes still available to the small country in open international financial markets in view of the optimum monetary policy that the large country adopts for itself. Both economies are based on nominal wage contracts with employment determined by the demand for labor under the contract terms. Reacting to movement in contemporaneously observable price variables, the monetary authorities of the large country, and of the small country under floating, aim to keep labor on its supply curve in the face of IS and LM shocks to aggregate demand, and shocks to aggregate supply. With monetary union, the small country trades discretionary monetary policy for greater stability in real exchange rates and insulation from its own idiosyncratic money supply and demand disturbances. The relative welfare costs of the different regimes for the small country are modeled and deduced from researched parameter values. The result is that there can be a stabilization rationale for accession to a monetary union except at low values of the correlations of like types of shocks for the large and small country.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University in its journal Journal of Economic Integration.

Volume (Year): 17 (2002)
Issue (Month): ()
Pages: 104-132

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ris:integr:0187
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:integr:0187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jong-Eun Lee)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.