IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ijcrhu/021585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advocacy of 4IR Agenda in Selected Feature Films: An Analysis of Aneesh Chaganty’s Searching and Nicholas D. Johnson & Will Merick’s Missing

Author

Listed:
  • Monsuru Oladotun OLAJIDE

    (Department of Performing Arts, Music & Film Studies, Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria)

  • Samson O. EBE

    (Department of Performing Arts, Music & Film Studies, Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria)

  • Adebayo J. BADEJI

    (Department of Performing Arts, Music & Film Studies, Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria)

Abstract

A film contains images that are projected on the screen to generate chimera of movements. It is a visual story-telling type of entertainment which can also serve as a tool of edification. Film is also used to probe vital social issues. It is deployed to make the audience take note of a development, learn about a new culture, and experience dissimilar perspectives on a given subject matter. Genre of films include; historical, science-fiction, comedy, drama, thriller, drama, adventure, crime, gangster, horror, western and musical. The genus of film that brings controversial discourse to the consciousness of its audience is referred to as advocacy film. Advocacy film also allows its audience to examine issues from different perspectives. Existing studies on films with advocacy are mostly documentary films. However, scant attention has been paid to advocacy feature-length films. Guided by Emerson Kim’s Media Advocacy Theory, this study investigates how the Fourth Industrial Revolution agenda were established in Aneesh Chaganty’s film; Searching and Nicholas D. Johnson & Will Merick’s film; Missing. The study concludes that film is not entertainment only; it could also serve as a means to display/situate social, political, cultural, economic and technological discourses in the age of industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Monsuru Oladotun OLAJIDE & Samson O. EBE & Adebayo J. BADEJI, 2023. "Advocacy of 4IR Agenda in Selected Feature Films: An Analysis of Aneesh Chaganty’s Searching and Nicholas D. Johnson & Will Merick’s Missing," International Journal of Contemporary Research in Humanities, Lead City University, vol. 1(1), pages 263-268, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ijcrhu:021585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://highgrace.org/injocorh/papers/INJOCORH%20Vol%201%20No%201%20(Complete)%20(2)_271-276.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ijcrhu:021585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Ademola Akanbi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.lcu.edu.ng/index.php/INJOCORH .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.