IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitics of the European Union: Are Steps backward the Way forward? - Geopolitica dell’Unione Europea: andando indietro si va avanti?

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The principal goal of integration in Europe in the post-Second World War period has always been the safeguarding of peace through economic integration. The European Union (EU) has overseen splendid economic achievements. A sign of that great success has been the EU’s continuous enlargement. However, geopolitics in Europe is transforming as Germany, France, Britain, Russia and Turkey explore ways to return to a version of the ‘old’ geopolitical equilibrium in which these countries, rather than the EU, call the tune in Europe. The eurozone is the crown jewel in the process of European integration, but it is also its weakest component. The eurozone is now synonymous with harsh austerity measures, protests and no prospect of any remarkable growth in many countries for a good many years to come. Obvious rifts between the EU’s countries are shaking its foundations like never before. The EU passed through many crises (approximately one a decade), and it always exited stronger. This time may be different. The EU may weather the storm. It may, however, end up as a big and important group, but not a very happy family of nations. The first decade of the 21st century was ‘lost’ for the EU, while the second decade may prove to be the epoch of its diminished global relevance. This is a pity as Europe has taken the reins in many global issues (e.g. environment). - Lo scopo principale dell’integrazione europea nel II dopoguerra è sempre stato quello di salvaguardare la pace attraverso l’integrazione economica. L’Unione Europea ha realizzato obiettivi economici grandiosi. Un segno di questo grande successo è stato il continuo allargamento dell’Unione. Comunque la geopolitica in Europa sta cambiando in quanto la Germania, la Francia, la Gran Bretagna, la Russia e la Turchia considerano la possibilità di tornare ad un “vecchio” equilibrio geopolitico all’interno del quale questi singoli paesi, piuttosto che l’Unione Europea, ne detengono il controllo. L’eurozona è il fiore all’occhiello del processo di integrazione europea, ma è anche il suo elemento più debole. Oggi eurozona è sinonimo di aspre misure di austerità, proteste, mancanza di apprezzabili prospettive di crescita per molti paesi e per molti anni a venire. I conseguenti disaccordi tra i paesi membri ne minano le fondamenta come mai era accaduto prima. L’Unione Europea ha attraversato molte crisi (approssimativamente una ogni decennio) e ne è sempre uscita più forte di prima. Ma questa volta potrebbe essere diverso. L’Unione Europea può uscire dalla tempesta, ma potrebbe anche accadere che essa diventi un gruppo di paesi grande ed importante, ma non una famiglia molto felice. Il primo decennio del ventunesimo secolo è “andato perso” per l’Unione Europea, mentre il secondo potrebbe rivelarsi l’epoca della perdita di rilevanza a livello mondiale. Questo sarebbe un peccato poiché l’Europa ha in mano le redini di molti problemi globali, quali per esempio l’ambiente.

Suggested Citation

  • Jovanovic´, Miroslav N. & Damnjanovic Simic, Jelena, 2013. "Geopolitics of the European Union: Are Steps backward the Way forward? - Geopolitica dell’Unione Europea: andando indietro si va avanti?," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 66(4), pages 455-482.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iei1946.it/RePEc/ccg/JOVANOVIC_DAMNIANOVIC%20455_482.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Geopolitics; European Union; Germany; France; Britain; Russia; Eurozone;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations
    • F55 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Institutional Arrangements

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.