IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soluzioni di aspettative razionali e processi collettivi di scelta -

Author

Listed:

Abstract

A number of selection criteria have been proposed in the literature to identify stable RE solutions for dynamic models. Some of them assume either explicitly or implicitly a coordination process of individual expectations that cannot easily be allowed for in a world. of atomistic agents. Building on previous work by Gray (1984) and Obstfeld, Rogoff (1986), conditions are first derived for an IRE model to admit a unique stable solution, and to run out bubbles. These depend on the indirect utility function of money, and on the Arrow-Pratt measure of relative risk aversion based on it. Within the context of a sequential game in which individuals attempt to forecast average expectations it is also shown that, when these conditions are not met, collusive behavior may lead to the enforcement of a (unique) non bubble solution in a wider variety of eases. Furthermore, when individuals are only uncertain about others’ expectations, uncertainty is resolved when the first observation becomes available. In this case, as in Diba, Grossman (1988), a bubble can start only at the beginning of the world, and cannot restart once it has bursted. However, if weather type uncertainty is also introduced in the model, collusive behavior may lead to the periodic onset of bubbles, similar to price warfares in an oligopoly model with uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • De Luzenberger, Raul, 1989. "Soluzioni di aspettative razionali e processi collettivi di scelta -," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 42(1-2), pages 47-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.