IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Deficits and Real Interest Rates in the United States: A Note on the Barro Theory versus the Cuckierman-Meltzer Theory of Government Debt and Deficits in a Neo-Ricardian Framework

Listed author(s):

The theory of « Ricardian Equivalence » as presented by Barro (1974) argues that government budget deficits exercise no impact on the rate of interest in an economy. By contrast, Cukierman and Meltzer (1989) argue that, under very reasonable circumstances, deficits will in fact raise real interest rates. The present paper empirically examines the validity of these two opposing views within the context of an open IS-LM system, using quarterly data for the United States over the period 1960-1985. Estimating by Instrumental Variables and in first differences, this study finds very strong empirical evidence that deficits do raise real interest rates. This evidence strongly supports the Cukierman-Meltzer arguments.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova in its journal Economia Internazionale / International Economics.

Volume (Year): 45 (1992)
Issue (Month): 3-4 ()
Pages: 289-295

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0450
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Via Garibaldi 4, 16124 Genova, Italy

Phone: +39 010 27041
Fax: +39 010 2704222
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angela Procopio)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.