IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liberalising Trade Policy and Industrial Protection: the European Union GSP Sensitivity Issue

Author

Listed:
  • De Lotto, Pietro F.

    (Facoltà di Scienze Politiche - Università di Trieste - Dip.to di Scienze economiche e statistiche)

Abstract

This paper deals with the concept of industrial “sensitivity” as a justification of the safeguard clause included in EU preferential trade agreements. To protect specific industries somehow considered more exposed to structural adjustment costs does not appear to be a comprehensive motivation. The subjective nature of the sensitivity (in other words, its arbitrariness) however, emerges clearly. We have adopted an analytical model called the “Sensitivity Diamond” in order to evaluate this fact within the new EU GSP scheme. The proposed model is based on three central variables: the (geographic) market concentration, the market competition level and the Trade Balance performance. Surprisingly, only the geographic concentration seems to be significant; furthermore, the obtained protection often appears to be a nonsense determined by a sort of “Defence of the Dominant”. The subjective aspect of sensitivity emerges from a community decision-making process which is affected by non-economic factors overcoming any economic and objective evidence. It represents further evidence of the existence of what has been called the “market of protection”.

Suggested Citation

  • De Lotto, Pietro F., 1997. "Liberalising Trade Policy and Industrial Protection: the European Union GSP Sensitivity Issue," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 50(1), pages 61-83.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.