IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

P. Pogany - The Global Income Elasticity of Trade: Theory and Potential Applications

Listed author(s):
  • Pogany, Peter

    (Research Division Office of Economics U.S. International Trade Commission)

Registered author(s):

Global income elasticity of trade (GIET) is the percentage increase in world imports or exports, attributable to a percentage increase in world income or output. Theoretical and econometric research has shown that greater ~than unitary income elasticities to import and to export have characterized the trade of the industrialized countries since World War Il. Given the overwhelming weight of the industrialized countries in world trade, this fact alone is sufficient to assert that greater than unitary GIET (that is, nonhomotheticity) prevailed in the postwar era. Nonetheless, for reasons of algebraic convenience and simplicity contemporary dynamic models lean heavily on the use of unitary national income elasticities of trade. By attributing homothetic preferences to all national and regional consumption, models inadvertently assign unity to the GIET, breeding errors in trade policy simulation models and depriving them of analytical opportunities. The analysis of global income elasticity must deal with two kinds of income effects, general and particular. The effect exerted on the volume of trade by rising levels of world income is the general income effect. The income effect that may be traced back to changes in the price ratios is the particular income effect. Accordingly, the GIET that captures both types of income effects may be called the gross GIET. The one that captures only the general income effects may be called the net GIET. For 1965-93, the net GIET was found to be at least 1.50, and was labeled very strong. When the net GIET exceeds 1, the use of the homothetic assumption in models devised to measure the consequences of trade policy alternatives leads to an understatement of the economic growth and welfare benefits of trade liberalization. Such understatements are evident in calculations regarding the benefits of the Tokyo Round and the Uruguay Round. JEL Classification: .

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova in its journal Economia Internazionale / International Economics.

Volume (Year): 51 (1998)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 401-428

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0299
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Via Garibaldi 4, 16124 Genova, Italy

Phone: +39 010 27041
Fax: +39 010 2704222
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Angela Procopio)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.