IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0029.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deregolamentazione del mercato del lavoro ed effetto Laffer: evidenza empirica dall’Italia (1997-2001) / Labour deregulation and the Laffer curve:empirical evidence from Italy (1997-2001)

Author

Listed:
  • Fedeli, Silvia

    (Università La Sapienza, Facoltà di Economia, Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica)

  • Forte, Francesco

    (Università La Sapienza, Facoltà di Economia, Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica,)

Abstract

According to J.M Buchanan, Laffer effects, increases in revenues produced by tax cuts that offset the fall in tax revenues the reduction caused, are delayed through time. This occurs because the demand for goods and factors of production affected by the reduction of tax rates tend to increase only through time. The delay may cause a trap because governments that plan to reduce taxes may not reap the benefits of the increased revenues in the legislature in which the policy decision was made. However, situations might occur in which the delay does not prevent governments from taking advantage already during the life of a legislature of the new tax revenues generated by the measures taken. This may be the case of tax cuts targeted specifically at supply-side areas with the highest elasticity as part of deregulatory policy that seeks to stimulate increases in demand in those areas positively impacted by a cut in tax rates. We have tested this hypothesis for the Treu reform, i.e., the Italian (centreleft) Government policy of partial deregulation of labour contracts that foresaw substantial reduction of social security contributions (SC) rates in the 1997-2001 period. The reform had positive effects not only on employment, but also on SC revenues, although with a somewhat delayed Laffer effect. The results were obtained by an econometric research whose technical details are presented in another paper. Here, we focus on the nature and effects of the Treu reform, which introduced new types of flexible labour contracts and related SC rates reductions. The results, in terms of new employment and SC revenues, are compared with the hypothetical employment and SC revenues in the absence of the reform. And they increase substantially through time. The results may throw light on the likely Laffer effects of other policies of detaxation cum deregulation such as, for instance, reduction of taxes on over-time earnings.

Suggested Citation

  • Fedeli, Silvia & Forte, Francesco, 2008. "Deregolamentazione del mercato del lavoro ed effetto Laffer: evidenza empirica dall’Italia (1997-2001) / Labour deregulation and the Laffer curve:empirical evidence from Italy (1997-2001)," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 61(2-3), pages 313-338.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iei1946.it/RePEc/ccg/FEDELI_FORTE%20313_338.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social Security Contributions; Laffer Effect; Labour Market Deregulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity
    • E27 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H27 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Other Sources of Revenue

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.