IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/buecrj/0501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Alternative Index Study in Determining the Level of Socio-Economic Well-Being: Evidence from the G-20 Countries with ARAS Method

Author

Listed:
  • Aras, Guler

    (Yildiz Technical University)

  • Mutlu Yildirim, Filiz

    (prevate)

Abstract

The level of well-being is important in terms of monitoring macro-level progress and determining the necessary strategies. Although economic factors are the focus of the well-being level assessment, an increase in concerns about social issues such as equality, health, safety, and quality life, along with the crises, reveals the need to consider social indicators in this valuation. Currently, there are many indices developed such as the Human Development Index and the World Happiness Index. Although the indicators of each index differ, it is seen that subjects such as “healthy and long life”, “education”, “gender equality”, “standard of living”, “labor force” come to the fore. In this study, in addition to these areas, indicators on the dimensions of "business environment", "communication infrastructure", "defense" and "population" are included. In terms of the scope of the focus area of each index, an index has been developed that can be an alternative to multidimensional, socio-economic well-being level indices in terms of representing all. To test the effectiveness of this index, an application has been made on the G-20 countries using the ARAS method and the countries that stand out in terms of socio-economic well-being level are listed. Comparing the findings with the related indices, similar results were observed. According to the results, it has been determined that Australia, Canada, America, Germany, and England are the countries with the highest socio-economic well-being level. However, Turkey, South Africa, Indonesia, Brazil, and India are located in the last row.

Suggested Citation

  • Aras, Guler & Mutlu Yildirim, Filiz, 2020. "An Alternative Index Study in Determining the Level of Socio-Economic Well-Being: Evidence from the G-20 Countries with ARAS Method," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 11(3), pages 735-751, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.berjournal.com/an-alternative-index-study-in-determining-the-level-of-socio-economic-well-being-evidence-from-the-g-20-countries-with-aras-method
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Socio-Economic Well-Being Index; G-20; Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques; ARAS;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D60 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - General
    • I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adem Anbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.