IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/buecrj/0100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Black Litterman Model and Markowitz Mean Variance Model with Beta Factor, Unsystematic Risk and Total Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Caliskan, Tuncer

    (Balıkesir University)

Abstract

This study aims to compare Black Litterman Model and Markowitz Mean Variance Model with beta factor, unsystematic risk and total risk. The data set used in this study covers daily corrected prices of 17 firms’ listed on ISE for the period between 2003 and 2009. By using Markowitz Mean Variance Model and Black Litterman Model, totally 26 portfolios are formed. Portfolios formed with two model are compared with their risks. The results of the study illustrates that the portfolios formed with Black Litterman Model have lower beta factor, unsystematic risk and total risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Caliskan, Tuncer, 2012. "Comparing Black Litterman Model and Markowitz Mean Variance Model with Beta Factor, Unsystematic Risk and Total Risk," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 3(4), pages 1-43, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.berjournal.com/comparing-black-litterman-model-and-markowitz-mean-variance-model-with-beta-factor-unsystematic-risk-and-total-risk
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Black-Litterman Model; Markowitz Mean-Variance Model; Beta Factor; Unsystematic Risk; Total Risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:buecrj:0100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adem Anbar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.