IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/bjobpr/022024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probing the Impact of Heuristic-driven Biases on Stock Market Anomalies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from an Emerging Asian Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Yasar Abbass

    (Faculty of Management Science, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan)

  • Shakeel Ahmed

    (Faculty of Management Sciences, HITEC University, Taxila, Pakistan)

  • Maqsood Ahmad

    (School of Accounting and Finance, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Purpose – This study investigates the effect of heuristic-driven biases on fundamental, technical, and calendar anomalies in the stock market during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the Pakistani emerging economy. Design/methodology/approach – The deductive approach was used as the research is based on the theoretical framework of behavioral finance. Data were collected from 307 individual investors actively trading on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) using a questionnaire and a cross-sectional design. The hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). Findings – The results indicate that heuristic-driven biases have a markedly positive influence on the fundamental, technical, and calendar anomalies during the COVID-19 pandemic in an emerging economy. This means that heuristic-driven biases significantly contribute to the occurrence of fundamental, technical, and calendar anomalies in the stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic in an emerging economy. These findings suggest that individual investors influenced by heuristics are prone to make biased decisions, leading to stock mispricing and market inefficiencies. Practical implications – This study encourages investors to avoid relying on heuristic-driven biases and emotional decision-making when trading in the stock market. It provides valuable awareness and understanding of these biases and their impact on stock market anomalies, particularly during times of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The insights offered by this study hold significant value for policymakers, market regulators, and professionals in financial institutions, including portfolio managers, investment banks, traders in commercial banks, and mutual funds. By recognizing and understanding heuristic-driven biases, investors can make informed decisions, select better investment tools and avoid repeating expensive errors, which occur due to heuristic biases. This, in turn, reduces stock market anomalies and promotes market efficiency. This study highlights the necessity of adopting specific investment strategies to control and mitigate 'mental mistakes' caused by heuristic biases. Investors can improve their decision-making processes by focusing on these strategies, ultimately creating a more efficient and effective market environment. Originality/value – The current study is the first to focus on links between heuristic-driven biases and stock market anomalies during the COVID-19 pandemic in an emerging economy. It adds to the literature in behavioral finance, specifically the role of heuristics in stock market anomalies; this field is in its initial stage, even in developed countries, while in emerging countries, little work has been done.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasar Abbass & Shakeel Ahmed & Maqsood Ahmad, 2026. "Probing the Impact of Heuristic-driven Biases on Stock Market Anomalies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from an Emerging Asian Economy," British Journal of Business and Psychology Research, Porcelain Publishing International Limited, vol. 2(1), pages 5-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:bjobpr:022024
    DOI: 10.47297/ppibjbpr2026020101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.ppipress.com/journal/article/preview?doi=10.47297/ppibjbpr2026020101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ppipress.com/journal/BJBPR/2/1/10.47297/ppibjbpr2026020101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47297/ppibjbpr2026020101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:bjobpr:022024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Xiaomei Chang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://porcelainpublishing.com/journal/BJBPR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.