IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v1y2013i2p119-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Conversational Journalism: An Experimental Test of Wiki, Twittered and ¡°Collaborative¡± News Models

Author

Listed:
  • Doreen Marie Marchionni

Abstract

Journalism-as-a-conversation has become a catchphrase for audience participation in the news. Largely missing from the literature, though, are clear conceptual and operational definitions of conversation that allow theory building for purposes of explanation and prediction. This exploratory study sought to help close that gap by theoretically indentifying a way to measure conversation¡¯s features in terms of the audience experience, then testing the model on outcome measures of perceived credibility and expertise in three online contexts: twittered, wiki and ¡°collaborative¡± news. Conversation¡¯s proposed features: coorientation/homophily (perceived similarity), social presence, friendliness, informality and interactivity. Findings suggest the features of perceived similarity to a journalist and online interactivity are key. Somewhat problematic is the conversational feature of informality with an audience. Results suggest journalists can easily come across as too casual with readers to the detriment of trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Doreen Marie Marchionni, 2013. "Measuring Conversational Journalism: An Experimental Test of Wiki, Twittered and ¡°Collaborative¡± News Models," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 119-131, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:119-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/260/232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/260
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:1:y:2013:i:2:p:119-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.