IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v9y2020i4p207-213.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of tax knowledge on relationship of procedural justice perception towards voluntary tax compliance mediated by trust

Author

Listed:
  • Rizky Rachmawan

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Business, Brawijaya University, Malang,Indonesia)

  • Rizky Rachmawani

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Business, Brawijaya University, Malang,Indonesia)

  • Noval Adib

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Business, Brawijaya University, Malang,Indonesia)

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effect of psychology factors toward voluntary tax compliance on personal taxpayers who have a business (MSME) in Malang Raya. Kirchler, Hoelzl, & Wahl (2008) define voluntary tax compliance as the obedience based on the feeling of trust towards the tax authority. This feeling of trust towards tax authority can be created from the procedural justice obtained and felt by the taxpayers. Tax knowledge of taxpayers is also expected to strengthen the effect of perception of procedural justice towards voluntary tax compliance and the trust towards the tax authority. The researcher employed samples of personal taxpayers who have a business (MSME) in Malang Raya through a convenience sampling method. The samples of this research were 405 respondents and were analyzed by using the SEM-PLS method with WarpPLS 6.0. The research results show that procedural justice perception affects the trust towards the authority and voluntary tax compliance, the trust towards the authority also mediates the effect of procedural justice perception towards voluntary tax compliance, but tax knowledge is not proven of strengthening procedural justice perception towards the trust towards the authority and voluntary tax compliance. The result indicates that to increase tax compliance the authority must make sure the fair procedure according to taxpayers. The fair procedure will establish trust in the authority and make taxpayers easier to comply. Tax knowledge doesn’t make the effect stronger because taxpayers only judge to comply according to the easy and simple procedure of tax system. Key Words: Tax Compliance Procedural Justice Trust Towards Tax Otority, Tax Knowledge

Suggested Citation

  • Rizky Rachmawan & Rizky Rachmawani & Noval Adib, 2020. "The effect of tax knowledge on relationship of procedural justice perception towards voluntary tax compliance mediated by trust," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 207-213, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:207-213
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/725/594
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.725
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dwi Ratmono, 2014. "Model Kepatuhan Perpajakan Sukarela: Peran Denda, Keadilan Prosedural, Dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Otoritas Pajak," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 18(1), pages 42-64, Juni.
    2. Dwi Ratmono, 2014. "Model kepatuhan perpajakan sukarela: peran denda, keadilan prosedural, dan kepercayaan terhadap otoritas pajak," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 18(1), pages 42-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:207-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.