IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v5y2016i2p71-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Making Through the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method:Contractor Selection in Construction Projects

Author

Listed:
  • A Oben Sabuncuoglu

    (Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Istanbul Ticaret Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkiye)

  • Ali Gorener

    (Isletme Fakultesi, Istanbul Ticaret Universitesi, Istanbul, Turkiye)

Abstract

Construction contractors have a great role in terms of operation work properly in construction project management. An effective contractor selection is most important to the success of any construction projects. Contractor selection is a multi criteria decision making problem which includes qualitative and quantitative characteristics. For the contractor selection problem, this study proposes a combined decision approach, which employs analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fuzzy Technique Ordered Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods. In the proposed approach, AHP is used to determine the weights of selection criteria, and Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to select appropriate contractor alternative. Additionally, a real case study in construction industry is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed approach. Key Words: Construction Projects, Contractor, Fuzzy Decision Making, AHP, TOPSIS

Suggested Citation

  • A Oben Sabuncuoglu & Ali Gorener, 2016. "Decision Making Through the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method:Contractor Selection in Construction Projects," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 5(2), pages 71-82, Special I.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:71-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/120/123
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/120
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:71-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Umit Hacioglu). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.