IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v2y2013i4p37-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Discussion on the European Debt Crisis by Fiscal Sociology

Author

Listed:
  • Chia-Jen Chang

    (Department of Public Affairs and Civic Education, National Changhua University of Education,Taiwan)

  • Chia-Jung Chung

    (Department of Public Affairs and Civic Education, National Changhua University of Education,Taiwan)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is that discuss the reasons of European debt crisis. Every European country adopts austerity policy, which cannot solve government debt problems and further lead to economic exacerbation and continuous recession, based on the neoclassical economic theory. In order to realize the root of European debt crisis, this article adopts the reaseach method of fiscal sociology. In this study, we think that the government debt problem is the result of economic profits conflict based on the Fiscal Sociology. The economic profits conflict of investment, consumption, international business and labor market will have influence on the government’s revenue and expenditure. Furthermore, the root of the European debt crisis is the uneven income distribution by financialization and neoliberalism

Suggested Citation

  • Chia-Jen Chang & Chia-Jung Chung, 2013. "A Discussion on the European Debt Crisis by Fiscal Sociology," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, Society for the Study of Business & Finance, vol. 2(4), pages 37-48, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:37-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/188/110/188-541-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/188/110
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ha, Sejin & Stoel, Leslie, 2009. "Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 565-571, May.
    2. Forsythe, Sandra M. & Shi, Bo, 2003. "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 867-875, November.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:37-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Senol Emir). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.