Author
Listed:
- Radiakga Thabang Molokomme
(Vaal University of Technology)
- Mpho Gift Motebe
(Vaal University of Technology Private Bag X021, Vanderbijlpark, 1900.)
Abstract
Corruption within law enforcement is not just an institutional failure, it is a betrayal of public trust that erodes the very foundation of justice. This study explores the systemic factors contributing to unethical practices among South African law enforcement officers, focusing on weak accountability, socio-economic pressures, and political interference. Grounded in Institutional Anomie Theory, the research employs a qualitative analysis of secondary data, including government reports, academic literature, and case studies, to uncover the root causes of police misconduct. The findings reveal that inadequate oversight mechanisms, financial strain on officers, and political influence create an environment where unethical behaviour thrives. To address these issues, the study recommends strengthening accountability frameworks, improving officer remuneration, and minimizing political interference in law enforcement operations. Additionally, comprehensive ethics training and leadership reforms are essential for fostering a culture of integrity. Beyond its practical implications, this research contributes to the theoretical discourse on ethical policing by emphasising the need for systemic change. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of policy interventions and ethical training programs to ensure long-term solutions. Restoring ethical policing is not merely an institutional challenge, it is a moral imperative. Key Words:Unethical Practices, Ethics, Law Enforcement, Accountability, Policing, Corruption, Political Interference.
Suggested Citation
Radiakga Thabang Molokomme & Mpho Gift Motebe, 2025.
"Blue lights and broken trust: Unmasking and reforming unethical conduct in South African law enforcement,"
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 14(5), pages 515-524, July.
Handle:
RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:515-524
DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.4113
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:515-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.