IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v14y2025i5p162-169.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political economy of health reform: Unpacking stakeholder interests in South Africa’s NHI debate

Author

Listed:
  • Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie

    (North-West University)

Abstract

South Africa’s journey toward universal health coverage through the proposed National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme reflects a deeply contested terrain of political, economic, and institutional interests. At the heart of the debate lies the struggle to transform an inequitable, dual-tiered healthcare system into a unified platform for equitable access. This article examines the political economy underpinning the NHI discourse by critically unpacking the roles, incentives, and power dynamics of key stakeholder groups, including government institutions, private healthcare providers, civil society, trade unions, political parties, and international actors. Using a political economy analysis framework, the study explores how stakeholder preferences and alignments shape the pace, design, and legitimacy of NHI reforms. It interrogates the conflicting narratives of equity and efficiency, state capacity versus market reliance, and centralized control versus decentralized delivery. Drawing on diverse reports, policy analyses, public submissions, and academic critiques, the research highlights how divergent ideological, financial, and institutional positions influence both policy content and public perception. Evidence from the research indicates that health reform in South Africa is not merely a technical endeavor but a deeply political process. Stakeholders engage in strategic behavior to either support, contest, or reshape the NHI, with implications for policy coherence, implementation feasibility, and constitutional alignment. The article concludes that sustainable health reform depends not only on sound policy design but also on transparent negotiation, inclusive dialogue, and adaptive political strategy. A nuanced understanding of stakeholder dynamics is therefore essential to realizing South Africa’s vision of health equity and universal coverage. Key Words:National Health Insurance, Political Economy of Health, Stakeholder Interests, Health System Reform, Universal Health Coverage, South Africa, Public-Private Partnerships

Suggested Citation

  • Suares Clovis Oukouomi Noutchie, 2025. "Political economy of health reform: Unpacking stakeholder interests in South Africa’s NHI debate," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 14(5), pages 162-169, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:162-169
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.4232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/4232/2863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.4232
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i5.4232?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:162-169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.