IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v14y2025i3p418-421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of safety culture in patient safety incident reporting: a literature review through the spider framework

Author

Listed:
  • Mutiara Desty

    (Unisba)

Abstract

Patient safety incident reporting is central to service quality, serving as a crucial component in internal learning and improvement processes, renewal, policy revision, and updates to existing standard operating procedures (SOPs) and guidelines. Low reporting rates of safety incidents highlight the importance of investigating the factors contributing to underreporting. This study aims to analyze the influence of safety culture on patient safety incident reporting. The research design employed in this study is a literature review. The SPIDER framework was used to guide the literature review. Articles selected for the study adhered to inclusion criteria, specifically journal publications within a maximum timeframe of the past five years (2019–2024). A strong safety culture has been shown to improve patient safety incident reporting rates with the influence variable are open communication, cooperation between units, non-blaming responses, feedback on errors, organizational learning, supervisor/manager expectations and actions, and hospital management support. Patient safety culture significantly influences the reporting of patient safety incidents. Key Words:patient safety incident, patient safety, safety culture

Suggested Citation

  • Mutiara Desty, 2025. "An examination of safety culture in patient safety incident reporting: a literature review through the spider framework," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 14(3), pages 418-421, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:418-421
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.3981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3981/2779
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.3981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i3.3981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:14:y:2025:i:3:p:418-421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.