IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i2p98-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of job satisfaction towards burnout with well-being as a mediator

Author

Listed:
  • Netty Merdiaty

    (Universitas Bhayangkara Raya University, Bekasi - Indonesia)

  • Neil Aldrin

    (Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Bekasi - Indonesia)

Abstract

The study examines burnout and the factors that influence it, namely job satisfaction and well-being as mediators or intervening. This study used a descriptive quantitative approach to test three hypotheses, a data collection tool using a psychological scale. To collect research data, the authors adopted sources adapted to local culture and developed research instruments using psychological scales with Likert type. For data analysis, use SPSS and SEM-PLS. The research finding is that job satisfaction can directly affect burnout and indirectly, from job satisfaction to well-being (as an intervening variable), then to burnout. The magnitude of direct influence is 0.135, while the magnitude of indirect influence is 0.540. Since the coefficient of an indirect relationship is greater than that of a direct relationship, the actual relationship is indirect. Thus, the role of well-being as a mediator function optimally or fully. Key Words:Burnout. Employee. Job satisfaction. Psychological.Well-being

Suggested Citation

  • Netty Merdiaty & Neil Aldrin, 2024. "The role of job satisfaction towards burnout with well-being as a mediator," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(2), pages 98-106, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:98-106
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3243/2227
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:98-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.