IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i2p458-479.html

Developing a change management measurement instrument for effective use of examination administration system

Author

Listed:
  • Ngoanamosadi Stanford Mphahlele

    (Department of Informatics, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa)

  • Raymond Mompoloki Kekwaletswe

    (School of Management, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa)

  • Tshinakaho Relebogile Seaba

    (Department of Informatics, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa)

Abstract

The quantitative change management measurement for effective use, which consists of operationalized change drivers, dimensions and sub-dimensions for effective use of Examination Administration System (EAS) in the South African context, has been scarcely discussed in the literature. This paper intends to develop and validate a change management measurement instrument (CHAMI) to measure the effective use of EAS in South Africa’s (SA) Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) colleges. The CHAMI was developed drawing on the survey measurement instruments literature for change management and effective use and assessed quantitatively using data collected from 215 EAS users across all 318 TVET colleges from nine provinces of SA. The empirical results found the existence of construct validity of the CHAMI with 11 dimensions (i.e. user involvement and change recognition, user satisfaction, performance measurement, technology use, EAS adaptive use, EAS verification, user learning, transparent interaction, representational fidelity, informed action, and effective use) and 63 questions. Another contribution this study stems from the way the research constructs in a measurement model are operationalized as they incorporate measurement class (i.e. reflective or formative). This paper presents a CHAMI for effective use of EAS. In the future, management, researchers and practitioners can use the CHAMI to measure effective use, espouse or adapt instrument as an additional use measurement dimension on United Nations digital transformation programmes index or test it in different settings to advance its generalizability. Key Words:Examination Administration System, Change management measurement model, Effective use, Technical and Vocational Education and Training colleges, Effective Use Theory

Suggested Citation

  • Ngoanamosadi Stanford Mphahlele & Raymond Mompoloki Kekwaletswe & Tshinakaho Relebogile Seaba, 2024. "Developing a change management measurement instrument for effective use of examination administration system," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(2), pages 458-479, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:458-479
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3090/2264
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3090
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wen-Lung Shiau & Margaret Luo, 2013. "Continuance intention of blog users: the impact of perceived enjoyment, habit, user involvement and blogging time," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(6), pages 570-583.
    2. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    3. Andrew Burton-Jones & Camille Grange, 2013. "From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 632-658, September.
    4. Kim, Changsu & Oh, Eunhae & Shin, Namchul & Chae, Myungsin, 2009. "An empirical investigation of factors affecting ubiquitous computing use and U-business value," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 436-448.
    5. Zenfrison Tuah Butarbutar & Putu Wuri Handayani & Ryan Randy Suryono & Wahyu Setiawan Wibowo, 2023. "Systematic literature review of Critical success factors on enterprise resource planning post implementation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 2264001-226, December.
    6. Weiyin Hong & Frank K. Y. Chan & James Y. L. Thong & Lewis C. Chasalow & Gurpreet Dhillon, 2014. "A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 111-136, March.
    7. Sayeed Salih & Samah Abdelsalam & Mosab Hamdan & Ashraf Osman Ibrahim & Anas W. Abulfaraj & Faisal Binzagr & Omayma Husain & Abdallah Elhigazi Abdallah, 2022. "The CSFs from the Perspective of Users in Achieving ERP System Implementation and Post-Implementation Success: A Case of Saudi Arabian Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ngoanamosadi Stanford Mphahlele & Raymond Mompoloki Kekwaletswe & Tshinakaho Relebogile Seaba, 2024. "Conceptual change management framework for effective use of examination administration system: a systemic review," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(1), pages 333-361, January.
    2. Andrew Burton-Jones & Olga Volkoff, 2017. "How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 468-489, September.
    3. Yu Tong & Sharon Swee-Lin Tan & Hock-Hai Teo, 2015. "The Road to Early Success: Impact of System Use in the Swift Response Phase," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 418-436, June.
    4. Walter Lasca & Marco Montemari, 2025. "What Makes Business Intelligence & Analytics Systems Stick? Identifying Recurrent Enablers in Management Accounting Practices," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(2), pages 133-156.
    5. Jonghak Sun, 2017. "The effect of information technology on IT-facilitated coordination, IT-facilitated autonomy, and decision-makings at the individual level," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 138-155, January.
    6. Jason A. Williams & Saurabh Gupta, 2025. "Integrating the IT Use Literature: Construct Validity and a Holistic Nomological Framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 563-583, April.
    7. Prasanna Tambe & Lorin M. Hitt, 2014. "Measuring Information Technology Spillovers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 53-71, March.
    8. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    9. Pradeep Racherla & Munir Mandviwalla, 2013. "Moving from Access to Use of the Information Infrastructure: A Multilevel Sociotechnical Framework," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 709-730, September.
    10. Weiling Ke & Lele Kang & Chuan-Hoo Tan & Chih-Hung Peng, 2021. "User Competence with Enterprise Systems: The Effects of Work Environment Factors," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 860-875, September.
    11. Chen, Hongquan & Zhang, Shuhua & Shao, Bingjia & Zhang, Yong & Zhao, Quanwu, 2026. "Instrumental vs. hedonic Affordances: Examining their impact on repurchase behavior on live commerce platforms through self-determination theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Yu-Kai Lin & Mingfeng Lin & Hsinchun Chen, 2019. "Do Electronic Health Records Affect Quality of Care? Evidence from the HITECH Act," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 306-318, March.
    13. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G. & Wakefield, James, 2016. "Business intelligence systems use in performance measurement capabilities: Implications for enhanced competitive advantage," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 1-17.
    14. Kwan Soo Hong & DonHee Lee, 2018. "Impact of operational innovations on customer loyalty in the healthcare sector," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(3), pages 575-600, September.
    15. Yu, JiangBo & Weng, JianCheng & Wang, Tian & Lin, PengFei & Sun, YuXing & Chai, JiaoLong, 2025. "How do differences in airline passengers’ satisfaction with connectivity modes affect last-mile travel choices? A SALC modeling based on RRM," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Gerald C. Kane & Maryam Alavi, 2008. "Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User-System Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 253-272, September.
    17. Xuequn Wang & Xiaolin Lin & Bin Shao, 2023. "Artificial intelligence changes the way we work: A close look at innovating with chatbots," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(3), pages 339-353, March.
    18. Jie Lou & Nianlong Han & Dong Wang & Xi Pei, 2022. "Effects of Mobile Identity on Smartphone Symbolic Use: An Attachment Theory Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Catherine Welch & Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki & Rebecca Piekkari & Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, 2022. "Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(1), pages 4-26, February.
    20. Lee, Kuo-Wei & Li, Chia-Ying, 2023. "It is not merely a chat: Transforming chatbot affordances into dual identification and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:458-479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.