IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i2p180-188.html

Non-life insurance: The state of the art of determining the superior method for pricing automobile insurance premiums using archival technique

Author

Listed:
  • Sandile Johannes Buthelezi

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

  • Taurai Hungwe

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

  • Solly Matshonisa Seeletse

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

  • Vimbai Mbirimi-Hungwe

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

Abstract

The pricing of insurance premiums in the non-life insurance sector remains a challenging and complex task. It demands a delicate balance between accurately estimating risk exposure and ensuring profitability for insurers. Generalised Linear Regression Models (GLMs) have become the preferred methods for premium price modelling in the motor insurance sector. While the approach of using a single superior model on which predictions are based ignores the use of robust estimator models. This paper examines various methodologies and sheds light on superiority of twenty-two models compared to each other for pricing automobile insurance. These methods vary from traditional actuarial methods to the modern statistical models such as machine learning algorithms. By using archival technique, their inferiority and superiority are explored, considering the ever-changing landscape of risk factors and market dynamics. Furthermore, it highlights the potential benefits of leveraging these methods and the mechanism for pricing short-term insurance, particularly in motor vehicle insurance. It also develops a framework that can be used in pricing to cater to risk analysis constituents to mitigate uncertainties and provide good services to clients. Our findings show that ANN, NN, XGB, random forest (RF) are superior models, and we conclude that the modern statistical methods can accurately estimate the risk exposure as compared to traditional methods such as the GLMs. Key Words:Archival technique, Automobile Insurance, Insurance Premium, Non-life insurance, Superior method

Suggested Citation

  • Sandile Johannes Buthelezi & Taurai Hungwe & Solly Matshonisa Seeletse & Vimbai Mbirimi-Hungwe, 2024. "Non-life insurance: The state of the art of determining the superior method for pricing automobile insurance premiums using archival technique," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(2), pages 180-188, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:180-188
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3211/2236
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3211
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roel Verbelen & Katrien Antonio & Gerda Claeskens, 2018. "Unravelling the predictive power of telematics data in car insurance pricing," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1275-1304, November.
    2. Edward W. (Jed) Frees & Fei Huang, 2023. "The Discriminating (Pricing) Actuary," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2-24, January.
    3. Rob Kaas & Marc Goovaerts & Jan Dhaene & Michel Denuit, 2008. "Modern Actuarial Risk Theory," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-540-70998-5, March.
    4. Denuit, Michel & Guillen, Montserrat & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Multivariate credibility modelling for usage-based motor insurance pricing with behavioural data," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 378-399, September.
    5. Denuit, Michel & Guillen, Montserrat & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Multivariate credibility modelling for usage-based motor insurance pricing with behavioural data," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2019039, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. Schlereth, Christian & Skiera, Bernd & Schulz, Fabian, 2018. "Why do consumers prefer static instead of dynamic pricing plans? An empirical study for a better understanding of the low preferences for time-variant pricing plans," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1165-1179.
    7. Shengkun Xie & Rebecca Luo & Yuanshun Li, 2022. "Exploring Industry-Level Fairness of Auto Insurance Premiums by Statistical Modeling of Automobile Rate and Classification Data," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Meng, Shengwang & Wang, He & Shi, Yanlin & Gao, Guangyuan, 2022. "Improving Automobile Insurance Claims Frequency Prediction With Telematics Car Driving Data," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 363-391, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jongtaek Lee & Andrei Badescu & X. Sheldon Lin, 2026. "A Portfolio-Anchored Frequency-Severity Risk Index for Trip and Driver Assessment Using Telematics Signals," Papers 2603.15839, arXiv.org.
    2. Catalina Bolancé & Montserrat Guillen & Ana M. Pérez-Marín & Anna-Patrícia Orteu, 2024. "Difference-in-Difference models to estimate causal effects on auto insurers behavior," IREA Working Papers 202411, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Feb 2024.
    3. Calcetero Vanegas, Sebastián & Badescu, Andrei L. & Lin, X. Sheldon, 2024. "Effective experience rating for large insurance portfolios via surrogate modeling," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 25-43.
    4. Gao, Guangyuan & Wüthrich, Mario V. & Yang, Hanfang, 2019. "Evaluation of driving risk at different speeds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 108-119.
    5. Jean-Philippe Boucher & Roxane Turcotte, 2020. "A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Distance Driven on the Probability of Car Accidents," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2021. "Pricing service maintenance contracts using predictive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 530-545.
    7. Dhiti Osatakul & Xueyuan Wu, 2021. "Discrete-Time Risk Models with Claim Correlated Premiums in a Markovian Environment," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Chen, Zezhun & Dassios, Angelos & Tzougas, George, 2022. "EM estimation for the bivariate mixed exponential regression model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115132, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Nemanja Milanović & Miloš Milosavljević & Slađana Benković & Dušan Starčević & Željko Spasenić, 2020. "An Acceptance Approach for Novel Technologies in Car Insurance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Montserrat Guillen & Jens Perch Nielsen & Ana M. Pérez‐Marín, 2021. "Near‐miss telematics in motor insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(3), pages 569-589, September.
    11. Tzougas, George & Makariou, Despoina, 2022. "The multivariate Poisson-Generalized Inverse Gaussian claim count regression model with varying dispersion and shape parameters," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117197, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Alicja Wolny-Dominiak & Tomasz Żądło, 2021. "The Measures of Accuracy of Claim Frequency Credibility Predictor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Michel Denuit & Yang Lu, 2021. "Wishart‐gamma random effects models with applications to nonlife insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 88(2), pages 443-481, June.
    14. Chen, Zezhun Chen & Dassios, Angelos & Tzougas, George, 2024. "EM estimation for bivariate mixed poisson INAR(1) claim count regression models with correlated random effects," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118826, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Deprez, Laurens & Antonio, Katrien & Boute, Robert, 2023. "Empirical risk assessment of maintenance costs under full-service contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(2), pages 476-493.
    16. Zezhun Chen & Angelos Dassios & George Tzougas, 2023. "Multivariate mixed Poisson Generalized Inverse Gaussian INAR(1) regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 955-977, June.
    17. Zezhun Chen & Angelos Dassios & George Tzougas, 2022. "EM Estimation for the Bivariate Mixed Exponential Regression Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Simon, Pierre-Alexandre & Trufin, Julien & Denuit, Michel, 2023. "Bivariate Poisson credibility model and bonus-malus scale for claim and near-claim events," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    19. Jiamin Yu, 2022. "Will claim history become a deprecated rating factor? An optimal design method for the real-time road risk model," Papers 2204.11585, arXiv.org.
    20. Tzougas, George & di Cerchiara, Alice Pignatelli, 2021. "Bivariate mixed Poisson regression models with varying dispersion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114327, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:180-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.