IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v13y2024i2p174-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimizing falsified financial reports: just an opinion on South African taxes

Author

Listed:
  • Mpho Yvonne Lerotholi

    (University of South Africa)

  • Solly Matshonisa Seeletse

    (Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University)

Abstract

The study criticizes the way South Africa collects taxes from different segments of the population, primarily pensioners and workers with two sources of income. It also condemns the ineffective manner in which it administers some tax payouts, especially in the unfairness that has shown bias to some groups. Primarily, taxing of the pensioners is condemned, as well as the taxing of second earnings of employees, mainly where there were victims of the apartheid policies. The paper recommends taxing people with caution, in order not to perpetuate apartheid-initiated poverty of the South African masses of people, and in cases where earners who are being taxed could be having extra financial responsibilities. In order to resolve these problems, taxpayers and tax preparers should make sure that tax laws are applied correctly, that they are aware of the consequences of breaking the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), and that they routinely review and update their tax return positions in response to modifications to accounting standards and tax legislation. Key Words:Accounting, Additional Funding Source, Financial Management, Pensioner, Taxpayer

Suggested Citation

  • Mpho Yvonne Lerotholi & Solly Matshonisa Seeletse, 2024. "Minimizing falsified financial reports: just an opinion on South African taxes," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 13(2), pages 174-179, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:174-179
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3169
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3169/2235
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3169
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i2.3169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:174-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.