IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v12y2023i9p440-449.html

The culture of reading for acquisition and learning of content knowledge for English language and literature in English in higher education

Author

Listed:
  • Kabelo Ramolula

    (Research Development and Postgraduate Studies, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa)

  • Milton Nkoane

    (Research Development and Postgraduate Studies, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa)

Abstract

This study aims to explore the culture of reading literary texts in higher education and the strategies that can enhance the acquisition and learning of the content knowledge for both English Language and Literature in English. The study adopted an interpretivist paradigm and qualitative research design. The study is qualitative in nature. Language in/for/with content and schema theories form the basis for the study. The former holds that language cannot be acquired outside content whilst schemata are stored mental structures that determine the acquisition of new knowledge; thus, literary content knowledge may not be acquired/learned outside linguistic and communicative competencies and vice versa. Data were collected from the relevant literature from the past six years. It was interpreted and analysed thematically. The results showed that students' habit of reading is poor which affects their academic performance. In addition, new technological devices make learning easier and more accessible, but it negatively affects students' ability to read authentic texts for information and entertainment. The study therefore concludes that university students do not read literary texts because of the bad use of information and communication technology. However, the use of digital libraries could improve the situation. The findings suggest that institutions of higher learning should have strategies to engage linguists and literary scholars in the habit of reading literary texts. University libraries should be equipped with relevant and updated digital reading materials. Key Words:Content, higher education, knowledge, language proficiency, literary texts, reading culture.

Suggested Citation

  • Kabelo Ramolula & Milton Nkoane, 2023. "The culture of reading for acquisition and learning of content knowledge for English language and literature in English in higher education," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 12(9), pages 440-449, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:440-449
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v12i9.2885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/2885/2134
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i9.2885
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i9.2885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoguang Zhao & Lei Zhu, 2012. "Schema Theory and College English Reading Teaching," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(11), pages 111-111, November.
    2. Senad Bećirović & Amna Brdarević-Čeljo & Vildana Dubravac, 2018. "The Effect of Nationality, Gender, and GPA on the Use of Reading Strategies Among EFL University Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    3. Sumaya Khalid Mustafa & Osama Sayfadin Ali & Mohammed Sherko Awlqadir & Rekar Jalal Mahmood, 2021. "Investigating Factors Affecting Poor Reading Culture Among Efl University Students," Education, Sustainability & Society (ESS), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 4(1), pages 33-38, April.
    4. Axelrod, Robert, 1973. "Schema Theory: An Information Processing Model of Perception and Cognition," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 1248-1266, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helta Anggia & Anita Habók, 2024. "University students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies (MARS) in online reading and MARS’ role in their English reading comprehension," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Zhongming Wang & Yixuan Shao, 2022. "Decide to Take Entrepreneurial Action: Role of Entrepreneurial Cognitive Schema on Cognitive Process of Exploiting Entrepreneurial Opportunity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Michael Ensley & Scott Marchi & Michael Munger, 2007. "Candidate uncertainty, mental models, and complexity: Some experimental results," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 231-246, July.
    4. Volker Lingnau & Florian Fuchs & Florian Beham, 2022. "The link between corporate sustainability and willingness to invest: new evidence from the field of ethical investments," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 335-369, September.
    5. Annina Boehm-Fischer & Joel T. Schmidt & Jens Nachtwei, 2022. "Ears on the Street: Practitioner Opinions on What Competencies Sales Executives Need and How to Develop Them," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    6. Zike Cao & Yingpeng Zhu & Gen Li & Liangfei Qiu, 2024. "Consequences of Information Feed Integration on User Engagement and Contribution: A Natural Experiment in an Online Knowledge-Sharing Community," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1114-1136, September.
    7. Wang, Shan & Karmakar, Shubhashis & Wang, Fang & Pei, Yanli, 2025. "Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Jeremy S. Wolter & Dora E. Bock & Christopher D. Hopkins & Michael Giebelhausen, 2022. "Not the relationship type? Loyalty propensity as a reason to maintain marketing relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1052-1070, September.
    9. Schweisfurth, Tim G. & Raasch, Christina, 2018. "Absorptive Capacity for Need Knowledge: Antecedents and Effects for Employee Innovativeness," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 47(4), pages 687-699.
    10. Jiraporn Noipa & Pilanut Phusawisot, 2025. "The Effects of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Instruction on Thai EFL Engineering Students: Metacognitive Strategy Use and Students' Attitudes," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(2), pages 263-263, March.
    11. Schweisfurth, Tim G. & Raasch, Christina, 2018. "Absorptive capacity for need knowledge: Antecedents and effects for employee innovativeness," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 687-699.
    12. Breugelmans, Els & Köhler, Clemens F. & Dellaert, Benedict G.C. & de Ruyter, Ko, 2012. "Promoting Interactive Decision Aids on Retail Websites: A Message Framing Perspective with New versus Traditional Focal Actions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 226-235.
    13. Youtie, Jan & Bozeman, Barry & Jabbehdari, Sahra & Kao, Andrew, 2017. "Credibility and use of scientific and technical information in policy making: An analysis of the information bases of the National Research Council’s committee reports," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 108-120.
    14. Benjamin D. Nye, 2014. "Cognitive modeling of socially transmitted affordances: a computational model of behavioral adoption tested against archival data from the Stanford Prison Experiment," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 302-337, September.
    15. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia, 2019. "Social engagement and socio-genesis of energy poverty as a problem in Spain," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 286-296.
    16. Xiong, Yuhao & Wang, Yonghai, 2024. "Research on the risk effects of accounting information disclosure," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Kristan Cockerill & Pierre Glynn & Estefania Santamaria Cerrutti & John C. Little, 2024. "Knowledge sources, narratives, and living in social-ecological systems," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Fang Chen & Yi Yang & Peiyi Huang & Xiaoyu Han, 2024. "Invariant (or Not) Reading Strategies Between Languages and Genders," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    19. Ryan Armstrong & Guillermo Jiménez, 2022. "Micro-Skills for Learning Soft Systems Methodology? Challenges and Opportunities in an Undergraduate Dissertation Project," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 831-853, December.
    20. Senad Bećirović & Vildana Dubravac & Amna Brdarević-Čeljo, 2022. "Cooperative Learning as a Pathway to Strengthening Motivation and Improving Achievement in an EFL Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:440-449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.